Answer:
13/12
Step-by-step explanation:
1-2/3+9/12
least common denominator is 12
12/12 - 8/12+9/12
13/12
Answer:
Null hypothesis is: U1 - U2 ≤ 0
Alternative hypothesis is U1 - U2 > 0
Step-by-step explanation:
The question involves a comparison of the two types of training given to the salespeople. The requirement is to set up the hypothesis that type A training leads to higher mean weakly sales compared to type B training.
Let U1 = mean sales by type A trainees
Let U2 = mean sales by type B trainees
Therefore, the null hypothesis (H0) is: U1 - U2 ≤ 0
This implies that type A training does not result in higher mean weekly sales than type B training.
The alternative hypothesis (H1) is: U1 - U2 > 0
This implies that type A training indeed results in higher mean weekly sales than type B training.
Answer:
0.57142858 is the answer hope this helped
The answer to question 5 is D.5 and the answer to question 9 is (-2,-6)
Answer:
3.08 x 
Step-by-step explanation:
3080 = 3.08 x 1000 = 3.08 x
