1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Rina8888 [55]
4 years ago
6

Barbara is the manager at a sports arena that draws an average of 2,700 patrons per event. each ticket taker can process 125 eve

nt-goers per event. how many ticket takers should barbara hire? (round up to a whole number.)
Business
2 answers:
galben [10]4 years ago
7 0

Answer:

22 ticket takers.

Explanation:

It is given that Barbara is the manager at a sports arena that draws an average of 2,700 patrons per event.

Each ticket taker can process 125 event-goers per event.

Let x be the number of ticket takers barbara should hire.

125\times x=2700

125x=2700

Divide both sides by

x=\frac{2700}{125}

x=21.6

x\approx 22

Therefore, Barbara should hire 22 ticket takers.

liberstina [14]4 years ago
6 0
Average patrons per event = 2,700

Number of event goers a ticket taker can process = 125

Therefore number of ticket takers that need hiring = 2700 ÷ 125 = 21.6 = 22 ticket takers
You might be interested in
Skysong Company signed a long-term noncancelable purchase commitment with a major supplier to purchase raw materials in 2021 at
k0ka [10]

Answer:Skysong journal $

Date

December 2020

Raw material Dr 984,100

Loss on raw material 48,000

Supplier Cr 1,032,100

Narration. recognition of raw materials purchased at agreed value.

2021

Supplier Dr. 1,032,100

Bank Cr. 1,032,100

Narration. Payment for raw materials purchased at agreed value.

Explanation:

The raw materials needs to be paid for at the agreed value not withstand ing the fall in value. However stock are to be recognized at cost or net realisable value which ever is less and since the market value of the stock has dropped this has to be recognized as a loss in the income statement to avoid the stock been over value.

6 0
3 years ago
Assume there are currently five firms producing and selling computer chips in the European market. Also assume that the product
irina1246 [14]

Answer: C. Increase

Explanation:

An oligopoly is a market structure in which a few firms dominate. When a market is shared between a few firms, it is said to be highly concentrated. Although only a few firms dominate, it is possible that many small firms may also operate in the market.

Where few firms dominate the equilibrium price will increase because the demand will be high, and this will make the equilibrium price increase.

3 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Suppose that the S&P 500, with a beta of 1.0, has an expected return of 13% and T-bills provide a risk-free return of 4%. a.
Aleksandr [31]

Answer:

a. The answers are as follows:

(i) Expected of Return of Portfolio = 4%; and Beta of Portfolio = 0

(ii) Expected of Return of Portfolio = 6.25%; and Beta of Portfolio = 0.25

(iii) Expected of Return of Portfolio = 8.50%; and Beta of Portfolio = 0.50

(iv) Expected of Return of Portfolio = 10.75%; and Beta of Portfolio = 0.75

(v) Expected of Return of Portfolio = 13%; and Beta of Portfolio = 1.0

b. Change in expected return = 9% increase

Explanation:

Note: This question is not complete as part b of it is omitted. The complete question is therefore provided before answering the question as follows:

Suppose that the S&P 500, with a beta of 1.0, has an expected return of 13% and T-bills provide a risk-free return of 4%.

a. What would be the expected return and beta of portfolios constructed from these two assets with weights in the S&P 500 of (i) 0; (ii) 0.25; (iii) 0.50; (iv) 0.75; (v) 1.0

b. How does expected return vary with beta? (Do not round intermediate calculations.)

The explanation to the answers are now provided as follows:

a. What would be the expected return and beta of portfolios constructed from these two assets with weights in the S&P 500 of (i) 0; (ii) 0.25; (iii) 0.50; (iv) 0.75; (v) 1.0

To calculate these, we use the following formula:

Expected of Return of Portfolio = (WS&P * RS&P) + (WT * RT) ………… (1)

Beta of Portfolio = (WS&P * BS&P) + (WT * BT) ………………..………………. (2)

Where;

WS&P = Weight of S&P = (1) – (1v)

RS&P = Return of S&P = 13%, or 0.13

WT = Weight of T-bills = 1 – WS&P

RT = Return of T-bills = 4%, or 0.04

BS&P = 1.0

BT = 0

After substituting the values into equation (1) & (2), we therefore have:

(i) Expected return and beta of portfolios with weights in the S&P 500 of 0 (i.e. WS&P = 0)

Using equation (1), we have:

Expected of Return of Portfolio = (0 * 0.13) + ((1 - 0) * 0.04) = 0.04, or 4%

Using equation (2), we have:

Beta of Portfolio = (0 * 1.0) + ((1 - 0) * 0) = 0

(ii) Expected return and beta of portfolios with weights in the S&P 500 of 0.25 (i.e. WS&P = 0.25)

Using equation (1), we have:

Expected of Return of Portfolio = (0.25 * 0.13) + ((1 - 0.25) * 0.04) = 0.0625, or 6.25%

Using equation (2), we have:

Beta of Portfolio = (0.25 * 1.0) + ((1 - 0.25) * 0) = 0.25

(iii) Expected return and beta of portfolios with weights in the S&P 500 of 0.50 (i.e. WS&P = 0.50)

Using equation (1), we have:

Expected of Return of Portfolio = (0.50 * 0.13) + ((1 - 0.50) * 0.04) = 0.0850, or 8.50%

Using equation (2), we have:

Beta of Portfolio = (0.50 * 1.0) + ((1 - 0.50) * 0) = 0.50

(iv) Expected return and beta of portfolios with weights in the S&P 500 of 0.75 (i.e. WS&P = 0.75)

Using equation (1), we have:

Expected of Return of Portfolio = (0.75 * 0.13) + ((1 - 0.75) * 0.04) = 0.1075, or 10.75%

Using equation (2), we have:

Beta of Portfolio = (0.75 * 1.0) + ((1 - 0.75) * 0) = 0.75

(v) Expected return and beta of portfolios with weights in the S&P 500 of 1.0 (i.e. WS&P = 1.0)

Using equation (1), we have:

Expected of Return of Portfolio = (1.0 * 0.13) + ((1 – 1.0) * 0.04) = 0.13, or 13%

Using equation (2), we have:

Beta of Portfolio = (1.0 * 1.0) + (1 – 1.0) * 0) = 1.0

b. How does expected return vary with beta? (Do not round intermediate calculations.)

There expected return will increase by the percentage of the difference between Expected Return and Risk free rate. That is;

Change in expected return = Expected Return - Risk free rate = 13% - 4% = 9% increase

4 0
3 years ago
Checking account A charges a monthly service fee of $20 and a wire transfer fee of $3, while checking account B charges a monthl
natali 33 [55]
 the answer should be  
D. 10 
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Brian Vargo, an auto repair mechanic who remains unemployed because he refuses to work for less than $1,000 an hour, is: a. not
malfutka [58]
<span>a. not counted as part of the labor force</span>
8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Esther is ninety years old, but she still shops for her own groceries every morning. When Esther was younger, she would head to
    12·1 answer
  • Taylor organizes and manages all his files and folders logically. How does this activity help Taylor in his daily work environme
    8·1 answer
  • HELP, ACCOUNTING
    8·1 answer
  • How do you find tax liability?
    8·1 answer
  • Accepting the kind of criticism that can help you grow is a trait of people with
    6·1 answer
  • Why should you be debt free
    8·1 answer
  • List at least three tools or services that are available when you open a savings account.
    5·1 answer
  • Lease or Sell Casper Company owns a equipment with a cost of $366,000 and accumulated depreciation of $53,200 that can be sold f
    12·1 answer
  • Write a letter to the current Unites States President, and put forth arguments regarding why you support or are against an incre
    13·1 answer
  • The Internet allows consumers to access information on-demand about products. This is an example of which kind of marketing util
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!