Answer: Raphael rejected Da Vinci's mystery and dusky modelling.
Explanation: Raphael emulated Leonardo's pyramidal composition and gestures like the ones he used in Madonna of the Rocks to unite the Virgin, John the Baptist, the Christ Child, and an angel but rejected his dusky modeling and mystery.
Raphael set his Madonna in a well-lit landscape and imbued her with grace, dignity and beauty. Both paintings were a few years apart and were both oil on wood paintings, although Da Vinci's Madonna of the Rocks was transferred to canvas.
Answer:
1) This situation is out of the standard set by Tarasoff decision’s duty to protect because the situation is severe and Dr. Yeung should not rely on probability. This could be possible that Aiden was trying to threaten Dr. Yeung and demanding no interference in his personal life. Dr. Yeung is a health psychologist but as a psychologist, she could understand the seriousness of the situation so she must call the professional support. Dr. Yeung should refer this case to the clinical psychologist and provide support to them about the health and behavior conditions.
2) Ethically, Dr. Yeung’s decision may affect the research purpose but morally her decision may help a person who needs it. The decision of Dr. Yeung was exceptional so it must be considered as an exceptional condition.
3) Dr. Yeung should consult the clinical psychologist and psychiatrists before handling this type of case. Dr. Yeung was not assigned to handle abnormal behavior problems and therapies, she could have handled the situation as an exceptional condition and with the help of team support.
4) Dr. Yeung should consider this case as health and abnormal behavior problem rather than a general condition. The behavior of Aiden was destructive and it should be analyzed with the help of security agencies, medical practitioner, psychologist and psychiatric. Dr. Yeung tried to done her job well but her lack of experience could have threaten her and patient’s life. I think, Dr. Yeung should demand professional help and experienced services.
Answer:
D.Begging the question
Explanation:
Begging the question is a form of circular reasoning, It occurs when the premises that are meant to support an argument already assume that the conclusion is true. If you start from a place where the conclusion being argued is already assumed true, then you're not really making an argument at all. There is no supporting evidence.
The statement 'And of course this is true because the government has no right to spy on its citizens.' in the question a begging the question fallacy because it assume the conclusions are true and not really stating an argument.
Answer:
b. Try not to argue with her or be defensive.
c. When talking with her, use clarifying statements to show her you understand the problem.
d. Don't dismiss what she says the problem might be.
Explanation:
- Lane should not argue with the person who is on the help desk and even that person also helps Lane in this mode.
- When you are talking with Lane, you should take about whatever she is talking about you are listening to her and understand her.
- Active listening should be there
- Never try to dismiss the problem whatever she is talking about her problems.
