Answer:
These rules were made by the Japanese in an attempt to seclude Japan and also prevent the Christianization of the nation.
Explanation:
The 1635 Edict proclaimed an order that contains numerous terms or reform orders that are meant to prevent anyone from leaving the country. It also orders the prevention of any foreigner's entry into the country, thereby "isolating" it from any outside factors.
The given excerpt is from the Edict of 1635, which "strictly forbids" Japanese ships to go to foreign countries. It also prohibits any Japanese subject from leaving the country, if found, must be executed. Ships caught leaving must be impounded, and the owner must also be arrested. And any returnee must be killed. All these rules were made to prevent any foreign intervention into Japan and also to prevent the entry of western religions such as Christianity.
It is called income which means money that is received through work or investments.
Answer:
B: Tolerating sweatshop conditions
Explanation:
I suppose C & D is one sentence... failing to meet shareholders expectations is not an ethical issue but an economic one. Manufacturing luxury consumer goods as such is not unethical, even if the manufacturing takes place in an underdeveloped country. That is, when the workers there are treated with respect (wages, conditions etc.). Unfortunately and as a rule they are not, which means that tolerating workers sweatshop conditions is unethical.
Answer: the contestants and observers thought the questioners were more knowledgeable than the contestants.
Explanation: Ross et al published a paper in the journal of personality and social psychology in 1977 titled
"Social Roles, Social Control, and Biases in Social-Perception Processes". They demonstrated that our actions and perceptions are determined by roles we have to play in interpersonal encounters; this is the biasing effect social roles have on performance.
In this instance the observers and the contestants perceived the questioners as having superior knowledge as the questioners were given latitude in how they frame the questions. Due to their social roles, the questioners were "the powerful" while the contestants and observers were "the powerless" playing out their roles and not taking into account the biasing effect.
If the roles were switched around, the outcome would still be the same with each group irrespective of their actual ability and knowledge.
This is a tough one! gesalt is how we organize sensations into perceptions (and even fill in some gaps)... so i would choose this as the best answer. knowledge and experience affects how we organize. IQ is ability to learn. cognition is the process of acquiring knowlege through thought, senses and experience.