Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
You have not given us any of the steps that Ricardo took to simplify the
expression, and you also haven't given us the list of choices that includes
the description of his mistake, so you're batting O for two so far.
Other than those minor details, the question is intriguing, and it certainly
draws me in.
If Ricardo made a mistake in simplifying that expression, I'm going to say that
it was most likely in the process of removing the parentheses in the middle.
Now you understand that this is all guess-work, because of all the stuff that you
left out when you copied the question, but I think he probably forgot that the 3x
operates on everything inside the parentheses.
He probably wrote that 3x (x-3) is
either 3x² - 3
or x - 9x .
In reality, when properly simplified,
3x (x - 3) = 3x² - 9x .
Answer:
a. 96 in²
Step-by-step explanation:
The surface area of the prism = the sum of the area of each part of the net shown
✔️Area of the 2 equal triangles = 2(½*b*h)
b = 4 in
h = 3 in
Area of the two triangles = 2(½*4*3) = 12 in²
✔️Area of the rectangle 1 with the following dimensions:
L = 7 in
W = 3 in
Area = L*W = 7*3 = 21 in²
✔️Area of the rectangle 2 with the following dimensions:
L = 7 in
W = 4 in
Area = L*W = 7*4 = 28 in²
✔️Area of the rectangle 3 with the following dimensions:
L = 7 in
W = 5 in
Area = L*W = 7*5 = 35 in²
✅Surface area of the prism = 12 + 21 + 28 + 35 = 96 in²
Step-by-step explanation:
6ac+10ac
2ac(6ac+10ac)
2ac(3+5)
to solve for y, we must multiply by t on both side to get ride of the t in the denominator. By doing this, we will get:
on the right side.
Subtracting 3, and we have successfully isolated y.
It would be impossible to get a quantitative value for y if we don't know the value of t.
