The basic inquiry that Rousseau looks to address in The Social Contract is on how is a strategy for partner to be discovered which will guard and secure utilizing the energy of all the individual and property of every part and still empower every individual from the gathering to obey just himself and to stay as free as earlier?" This inquiry may be revamped as taken after; how is an arrangement of reliance on each other to be set up while every individual part protects his own particular flexibility? This is a well-established inquiry in which we attempt and figure out how to build up authentic political specialist where a state can exist that keeps up, as opposed to compels, opportunity.
Explanation:
a. England's war against Spain
b. the raids on Spanish settlements in North America
c. the defeat of the Spanish armada
d. the establishment of Jamestown
Don't take my word, but it could have been because they were closer to Austria
Enslave the Natives. That is a big one.
Answer:
Your question is very ambiguous. Assuming that your question is about colonization, I would try my best to answer. Colonization (taking of land) was justified into three categories: God, gold, and glory.
Explanation:
<h2>Europeans justified their colonialism that what their doing is "holy work" because they are widening their religious belief (Christianity) to save indigenous people. They used religion to justified their brutal ways of taking the land away from the "indians" and they believed that by their influence, they were giving them a "better" life. Europeans also justifies their colonization by expanding their kingdom and making them more powerful (glory). Lastly, colonization happened because people seek more riches (gold) and spices. </h2>
