Answer:
i think B
Step-by-step explanation:
because if we think logically...the price have to more than 10-28.All answer except B are illogical for me i think
hope its help
x-intercept(s): (1/2, 0) or (0.5, 0)
y-intercept(s): (0, −2)
<h3>
Answer: 14s^4 - 7s^2 + 15</h3>
====================================================
Work Shown:
(12s^4-6s^2+4s)+(6s^4-4s+27)-(4s^4+s^2+12)
12s^4-6s^2+4s+6s^4-4s+27-4s^4-s^2-12
(12s^4+6s^4-4s^4)+(-6s^2-s^2)+(4s-4s)+(27-12)
14s^4-7s^2+0s+15
14s^4-7s^2+15
Note: don't forget to distribute the negative to every term in the last parenthesis
<span>Juanita
is watering her lawn using the water that is stored by rainwater.
=> the water in the tank drops 1/3 inch in every 10 minutes she waters.
=> The tanks water level is 4 feet.
Question : Number of days can Juanita waters is she waters 15 minutes per day.
=> 4 feet is the total amount of water = 1 ft = 12 inches
=> 48 inches in total
=> 1/3 inch is used every 10 minutes = 0.33 inches
=> she waters 15 minutes per day = 0.495 inches in every 15 minutes
Solution
=> 48 inches / 0.495 inches per day
=> 96.97
So Juanita can use all the water in water tank for approximately 97 days.</span>
John's effective annual rate is about
(1 +.0576/4)^4 -1 ≈ 5.8856%
According to the "rule of 72", John's money will have doubled in
72/5.8856 = 12.23 years
John's balance will be $4500 in 1989.
_____
Since you're only concerned with the year (not the month), you don't actually need to determine the effective annual rate. The given rate of 5.76% will tell you 72/5.76 = 12.5 years. The actual doubling time is closer to 12.12 years, so using the effective rate gives results that are closer, but "good enough" is good enough in this case.