The greatest priority in every State is security. As a matter of fact, a nation without a powerful military can be an attractive target for terrorists. However, countries present different realities and what may seem the best investiment for one country might not be the right alternative for another. It all depends on the situation and the level of development of each nation-state. If we take into consideration that the money ($11 billion) the U.S spent in Iraq, that was labeled as "wasted" later on, could have paid over 220,000 teachers' salaries, the answer to this question becomes very obvious. In my opinion, having a balance between both investments is vital. But, if I had to choose, I'd choose to invest in infrastructure because they're essential to a country's economy and prosperity; a country that is economically developed and prosper will manage its military successfully.
Answer:
The answer is: the biological approach.
Explanation:
There are different theoretical approaches in the study of psychological disroders, based on their emphasis and on the causes that they use to explain psychological disorders. The behavior approach, psychodinamic, and cognitive approach are among them.
The biological or medical approach focuses on the medical causes of psychological disorders. According to this theoretical approach, psychological disorders are in fact mental illnesses, consequence of chemical imbalances or brain damage. The view of a disorder as an illness has implications in treatment, psychological disorders are treated like any other disease, with pharmacological treatment.
Answer:
if u are a member of the nato get help from them
He became famous for B. iron
Hope this helps
Answer: c. Moved away from a strictly rational reasoning model for rational thought.
Recently, the rational choice theory has been criticized for leaving out some important factors that might influence the choices people make. Institutions and uncertainty can lead people to make a choice they would not have made under unconstrained circumstances solely dependent on reason. Therefore, new concepts have arisen, such as the "bounded rationality" idea. This is an attempt to recognize the limits that rationality has in real life.
Some works that have dealt with this problematic are: <em>Pathologies of Rational Choice Theory</em> (Green and Shapiro, 1994) and <em>Neuropolitics</em> (William E. Connolly, 2002).
