Answer:
The correct answer is letter "A": Cooperative.
Explanation:
Cooperatives or co-ops are not real state ownerships but imply being in charge of a property under a lease agreement. Similar to condominiums, individuals can live in an apartment that belongs to an owner that in co-ops are companies. The tenant purchases stocks of the company becoming a stakeholder and in return, the company provides the tenant an apartment with a lease agreement for the possession of the property.
Answer:
Impulse Buying
Explanation:
She isn't thinking about the long term effects of her purchase, like the repayments, but is instead thinking about her short term gain.
The statement " It eliminates the inflows of cash earned following the payback period and time value of money" is the disadvantage of the payback method
The payback period is the period thats tells the time period in which the initial investment that was made should be recovered.
It is to be measured in years normally.
For finding the disadvantage, we need to find out the following information related payback period
- It is easy to calculate
- The cash flows earned after the payback period should not be used
- There is no requirement to determine the present value factor for measuring the payback period.
- Also, it does not use for distinct cheap projects from lower ones
So this is the reason this method ignored the times value of money
Therefore, we can conclude that, the correct option is b.
Learn more about the payback method here: brainly.com/question/16255939
The performance management approach that uses job performance evaluations to identify a company's best, average, and worst performing employees, using person-to-person comparisons, is known as "forced ranking".
<h3>What is forced ranking?</h3>
The contentious practice of "forced ranking," which grades employees against one another rather than against performance standards, is very popular in corporate America.
The problem with forced ranking are-
- This can lead to a lack of motivation and disengagement among employees as well as unneeded internal competition that can harm collaboration, creativity, and innovation and divert attention from market competition.
- Although contentious, forced ranking systems are legal. Employers who choose to take action based on those rankings, however, run a number of legal dangers.
The forced rankings beneficial from an employee perspective, here are reasons-
- This system teaches a manager how to assess employees objectively with the right management training.
- When the management system needs to be improved or formalised, forced rankings are advantageous.
- An essential component of business is analysing trends and developments.
To know more about example of forced ranking, here
brainly.com/question/6626507
#SPJ4
