Answer:
You are still likely to do the favor for Sarah because you have just been a subjected to of the <u>coercion</u> technique.
Explanation:
Coercion is a situation whereby someone is being forced to do something aaginst his or her will. The person making the request does not consider the desires or wishes of the other individual whose help he or she seeks for.
<em>Sarah requesting the exact time to be picked uo without considering whether it would be convient for me is called coercion</em>
Certainty, Reliability, and Trustworthiness
A single-interest group is a group that is trying to push forward legislation and momentum around, well, a single-issue.
This might mean gun-control or reproductive rights.
They might have candidates in one party that they prefer but they are broadly trying to convince ALL candidates to believe what they believe.
So, B is the correct answer.
I think the summary judgement would be inappropriate in this case
Summary judgement is entered by the court if the plaintiff does not have sufficient evidence that the defendants actually do what they're accused of before moving to trial.
On this case, There is a strong proof that peoples restaurant is aware of Hoag's alcoholism : <u>intoxicated</u>
This mean that sabo can proof that the bar know hoag is an alcoholic and had served enough amount to hoag to get him intoxicated.
This mean that Sabo's case is strong enough to be brought to the trial. keep in mind that Sabo is unlikely to win the trial since the restaurant does not directly involved in the accident. but we can definitely say that summary judgement would be inappropriate in this case.
