All categories

3 years ago

Find the value of X.

Mathematics

2 answers:

s344n2d4d5 [400]3 years ago

8 0

The sum of three angles have to equal to 180°.
(right angle : 90°)
2x + 15 + 90 + x = 180
3x + 105 = 180

3x = 75

x = 25

so the angles would be
25° , 90° , 65°

nordsb [41]3 years ago

3 0

90+(2x+15)+x=180
90+2x+15+x=180
105+3x=180
3x=75
x=75/3
x=25degree

You might be interested in

Find the next term of the following sequence. 25, 10, 4, ... 1.) 0 2.) 8/5 3.) -5

Lostsunrise [7]

Answer:

2.) 8/5

Step-by-step explanation:

a4 = 8/5

5 0

2 years ago

Here’s Question three

Hitman42 [59]

Answer:

BD = 3 units

Step-by-step explanation:

Since, AD is an angle bisector of ∠BAC,

m∠BAD = m∠CAD = 20°

CD = 3 units

In ΔACD and ΔABD,

m∠BAD = m∠CAD = 20° (Given)

AD ≅ AD [Reflexive property]

Therefore, by H-A property of congruence both the triangles will be congruent.

And by CPCTC,

CD ≅ BD = 3 units

5 0

3 years ago

168 h = [?] days helppp

Nitella [24]

24 h in 1 day

just divide the hours by 24

168 : 24 = 7

6 0

3 years ago

Each year, more than 2 million people in the United States become infected with bacteria that are resistant to antibiotics. In p

Bingel [31]

Answer:

Null hypothesis:H₀:- There is no significant difference between in drug resistance between the two states

Alternative Hypothesis :H₁:

There is significant difference between in drug resistance between the two states

B)

The calculated value Z = 2.7261 > 2.054 at 0.02 level of significance

Rejected H₀

There is a significant difference in drug resistance between the two states.

P - value = 0.0066

P - value = 0.0066 < 0.02

D)

1) Reject H₀

There is a significant difference in drug resistance between the two states.

Step-by-step explanation:

Step(i):-

Given first sample size n₁ = 174

Suppose that, of 174 cases tested in a certain state, 11 were found to be drug-resistant.

First sample proportion

$p_{1} = \frac{x_{1} }{n_{1} } = \frac{11}{174} = 0.0632$

Given second sample size n₂ = 375

Given data Suppose also that, of 375 cases tested in another state, 7 were found to be drug-resistant

Second sample proportion

$p_{2} = \frac{x_{2} }{n_{2} } = \frac{7}{375} = 0.0186$

Step(ii):-

Null hypothesis:H₀:- There is no significant difference between in drug resistance between the two states

Alternative Hypothesis :H₁:

There is significant difference between in drug resistance between the two states

Test statistic

$Z = \frac{p_{1}-p_{2} }{\sqrt{PQ(\frac{1}{n_{1} }+\frac{1}{n_{2} } ) } }$

Where

$P = \frac{n_{1}p_{1} +n_{2} p_{2} }{n_{1} +n_{2} }$

$P = \frac{174 (0.0632) + 375 (0.0186) }{174+375 } = \frac{17.9718}{549} = 0.0327$

Q = 1 - P = 1 - 0.0327 = 0.9673

Step(iii):-

Test statistic

$Z = \frac{p_{1}-p_{2} }{\sqrt{PQ(\frac{1}{n_{1} }+\frac{1}{n_{2} } ) } }$

$Z = \frac{0.0632-0.0186 }{\sqrt{0.0327 X 0.9673(\frac{1}{174 }+\frac{1}{375 } ) } }$

Z = 2.7261

Level of significance = 0.02 or 0.98

The z-value = 2.054

The calculated value Z = 2.7261 > 2.054 at 0.02 level of significance

Reject H₀

There is a significant difference in drug resistance between the two states.

P- value

P( Z > 2.7261) = 1 - P( Z < 2.726)

= 1 - ( 0.5 + A (2.72))

= 0.5 - 0.4967

= 0.0033

we will use two tailed test

2 P( Z > 2.7261) = 2 × 0.0033

= 0.0066

P - value = 0.0066 < 0.02

Reject H₀

There is a significant difference in drug resistance between the two states.

8 0

3 years ago

Which is an equivalent expression

Harlamova29_29 [7]

Answer:

the answer to that is the second one, 4^-4

8 0

3 years ago