Answer:
(5, -1)
Step-by-step explanation:
You find the center of both the coordinates. For the x axis: 3+7 = 10. 10/5=2. For the y axis: -4+2=-2. -2/2 = -1. Put them together and get the answer! :)
The slope of the line that is perpendicular to 6x + 2y = -32 is: 1/3.
<h3>What is the Slope of Perpendicular Lines?</h3>
The slope of two lines that are perpendicular to each other will always have a product that is equal to -1, which means that their slopes are negative reciprocals to each other.
Rewrite 6x + 2y = -32 in slope-intercept form:
2y = -6x - 32
2y/2 = -6x/2 - 32/2
y = -3x - 16
The slope is -3. Negative reciprocal of -3 is 1/3.
Therefore, the slope of the perpendicular line would be: 1/3.
Learn more about the slope of perpendicular lines on:
brainly.com/question/1362601
#SPJ1
Answer:
A) Distance time graph
B) d(t) = 25t
C) The expression shows the distance more clearly.
Step-by-step explanation:
A) A distance time graph as seen in the attachment provides a representation of the distance travelled.
We are told the car travels at a constant speed of 100 meters per 4 seconds. Which means that 100 m for each 4 hours. So, for 200m, it's 8 hours like seen in the graph and for 300m,it's 12 hours as seen in the graph.
B) And expression for the distance is;
d = vt
Where;
d is distance in metres
v is speed in m/s and t is time
We are told that the car travels at a constant speed of 100 meters per 4 seconds.
Thus, v = 100/4 = 25 m/s
Distance travelled over time is;
d(t) = 25t
C) Looking at both A and B above, it's obvious that the expression of the distance shows a more clearer way of getting the distance because once we know the time travelled, we will just plug it into the equation and get the distance. Whereas, for the representation form, one will need to longer graphs if the time spent is very long.
Answer:
The answer is A: y^2/2x
Step-by-step explanation:
Hope this helps please mark brainliest :)
The term (2 + 8) is described as the total amount of pieces of fabric. It makes it easier to put this term this way so you wouldn't have to do (8 x 5) + (2 x 5) and do the distributive property.