Answer:
x=109 degrees
Step-by-step explanation:
so 33+39+x=180 degrees because of sum of angles in a triangle theorem. Then now you solve because of algebra
Answer:
<h2>C. $1,689.00</h2>
Step-by-step explanation:
Let the amount spent by Tim be x and the amount spent by Nikko be y
If Tim spent $55 more than 2/3 of the amount that Nikko spent for his computer, then amount spent by Tim will be x = 55+2/3 y
Since the total amount that Tim and Nikko spent for their computers was $2,870 then;
x+y = $2,870
Substituting x = 55+2/3y into the equation above, we will have;
55+2y/3 + y = 2,870
(165 + 2y)/3 + y = 2,870
(165 + 2y+3y)/3 = 2,870
cross multiply
165 + 2y+3y = 3*2870
165+5y = 8610
5y = 8610-165
5y = 8445
y = 8445/5
y = 1689
<em>Hence Nikko spent a sum of $1,689.00 on his computer.</em>
Answer: Option D) 6
Solution:
xy=k
What is the constant of variation: k=?
when x=-3 and y=-2
Replacing the knwon values in the given equation:
xy=k; x=-3, y=-2
(-3)(-2)=k
Multiplying the values:
6=k
k=6
You put 3 muffins in the bag.
I found out by doing 12 ÷ 3 = 12, so it's 3
Answer:
No , the cause and effect can be finished up through analyses as it were.
What we have in the inquiry is only an observational investigation where we basically study 3000 grown-ups and attempt to outline the outcomes with no trial proof.
Imagine a scenario in which individuals who had breakfast normally were inclined to maintain their weight reduction, for sure if individuals who keep up weight reduction will in general have breakfast routinely.
henceforth the circumstances and logical results relationship cannot be built up
So as to do so , one must lead measurable trials, for example, autonomous example t test or ANOVA examination
