1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Basile [38]
3 years ago
10

Choose the sentence that shows INCORRECT verb usage.

Social Studies
1 answer:
Nataly [62]3 years ago
6 0
The correct answer is C. instead of "i done my homework." its I did my homework because its past tense.
You might be interested in
How has religion tolerance being maintain in nepal?with examples​
Andreas93 [3]

Answer:

Secularism helps promote religious tolerance, which is required to maintain peace, co-operation, and unity among people. ... Nepal has maintained Religious tolerance. Lord Gautama Buddha was also a perfect examples He introduced Buddhism although he was from Hindu background

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
In explaining how a person can enter a social contract and be obliged to the laws of civil society, locke invokes the notion of
marissa [1.9K]

In explaining how a person can enter a social contract and be obliged

to the laws of civil society, Locke invokes the notion of "tacit consent." Rawls, who is also a "social contract theorist," of sorts, argues that a social contract can arise only from "hypothetical consent." What is the difference between Locke's notion of tacit consent and Rawls's notion of hypothetical consent?

a) Tacit consent requires actually expressing one's consent to the terms of the contract, whereas hypothetical consent simply requires that a citizen would have given consent under certain ideal conditions.

b) One who gives tacit consent implies consent to the terms of the contract through her actions, whereas someone who gives hypothetical consent offers her explicit word on the basis of her particular desires.

c) One who gives tacit consent implicitly suggests, through her actions, that she accepts the terms of the contract, whereas to say that someone hypothetically consents means that she would have consented to the terms of the contract were she asked to do so under certain ideal conditions.

d) Tacit consent is consent given in the state of nature, whereas hypothetical consent occurs within an ideal society.

e) Tacit consent is consent given by any rational agent, irrespective of her particular desires or ends, whereas someone who gives hypothetical consent agrees to the terms of the contract based on some particular desire that she has.

Answer:

c) One who gives tacit consent implicitly suggests, through her actions, that she accepts the terms of the contract, whereas to say that someone hypothetically consents means that she would have consented to the terms of the contract were she asked to do so under certain ideal conditions.

Explanation:

The major difference between Locke's notion of tacit consent and Rawl's notion of hypothetical consent is that unlike tacit consent, someone that hypothetically consents means that the person would have likely consented to the terms of the contract if she was asked to do so under certain ideal conditions.

Tacit consent involves implicitly suggesting through actions that she accepts the terms of the contract.

5 0
3 years ago
1. Explain the term rural-urban drift.
Ivanshal [37]

Answer:

1. Rural-Urban Drift is the movement of people from the countryside or villages to cities or towns as a reaction to some of the prevailing conditions in the rural areas. In other words, conditions in rural areas are causing people to move to cities and towns.

2. Four causes of Rural-Urban Drift may be political conflicts, income disparities, better education, or the search for better living conditions.

3. Four effects of Rural-Urban Drift in urban areas could be unemployment, poor sanitation due to overcrowding, increase in crime rate due to unemployment, shortage of basic amenities, and increased environmental pollution.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
If a nation is rich in resourses then it developed justify<br><br>​
diamong [38]

It would be a fair assumption to make that a country with a large amount of natural resources would be more likely to develop fastest and furthest. This could be assumed because natural resources in a country would be likely to stimulate trade at first within that country, and later to outside countries.

6 0
4 years ago
One result of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act of 1930, which increased tariffs on imports to the United States, was that
Anna11 [10]
<span>international trade decreased</span>
5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Primary structural assimilation is greater for hispanics than:
    13·1 answer
  • Match the person to the information contributed to Luke's writings.1. Paul2. Luke3. Philip4. eyewitnesses5. JamesA. investigated
    6·1 answer
  • Why enslaved person joined the military
    10·1 answer
  • Emotional arousal and experience occur at the same time because of stimulation of the cerebral cortex, according to the _______
    13·1 answer
  • The theory of public choice: examines why the public rejects so many bond referendums. emphasizes the self-interest of decision
    5·1 answer
  • Which of the following became true of the arms race during the cold war?
    15·1 answer
  • How were Richard Russell's and Carl Vinson's approaches to growing Georgia's economy similar or different? Please hurry its for
    10·1 answer
  • Please help me in this question​
    15·1 answer
  • Hi
    10·2 answers
  • How does a village panchayat maintain justice in a village
    15·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!