Answer:
The correct answer is B. had a substantial and significant impact on Progressivism. never developed support in the United States
Explanation:
Socialism had a substantial and significant impact on Progressivism. never developed support in the United States
The correct answer is "The French had a number of alliances with the Indians, but the British had a larger number of troops."
How did the military of the French and the British compare as the French and Indian War began? Answer: "The French had a number of alliances with the Indians, but the British had a larger number of troops."
Contrary to what had happened to the white English colonists, the French were not interested in settling the lands of the North American territory. The French were only interested in getting rich with the fur trade. So their relationships with the Native American Indian tribes were so much better than the English relationships with the Indians. The Native Indians had so much resentment and hard feelings against the English.
That is why, regarding the military at the beginning of the French and Indian War, the French had a number of alliances with the Indians, but the British had a larger number of troops.
Answer:
Member check
Explanation:
Member checking is a qualitative technique that is used to establish the truth of the research study’s findings. It also means a process that shows that the findings of a particular research are accurate and truthful.
Member checking also involves the process of getting and sharing the entire findings of the study with the research participants.
Member checking is the foundation to establishing trustworthiness with the participants of the research.
Answer:
The New England Colonies had a very different relationship with the Natives, one which involed alliances and trade. ... uring the period of 1609-1610 which was known as the starbving time, the settlers raided the Indians for food. in retribution, the local indians killed all the livestock and kept the colonists barricated.
Hope this helps!!
Explanation:
Answer:
Has an exposure to negligent misrepresentation.
Explanation:
Negligent misrepresentation occurs when a person, in this case the agent in the exercise, has made a statement about something or someone (in this case a property) without having any reason to believe it true. As the name says, negligent misrepresentation; the agent should've noticed a clearly visible and obvious problem (negligence) and then he said it was all ok (misrepresentation).
