Answer:
Option B is correct.
Angle DAC is congruent to angle DAB
Step-by-step explanation:
Given: Segment AC is congruent to segment AB.
In ΔABD and ΔACD
[Given]
[Congruent sides have the same length]
AB = AC [Side]
AD = AD [Common side]
[Angle]
Side Angle Side(SAS) Postulate states that if two sides and the included angle of one triangle are congruent to two sides and the included angle of another triangle, then the two triangles are congruent.
Then by SAS,
By CPCT [Corresponding Parts of congruent Triangles are congruent]
then;
therefore, only statement which is used to prove that angle ABD is congruent to angle ACD is: Angle DAC is congruent to DAB
The answer would be 2160 because v=l*w*h so 10*12*18 would equal 2160
Answer:
0 ≤ t ≤ 5.
Step-by-step explanation:
In the function 
, 
is the independent variable. The domain of 
is the set of all values of that this function can accept.
In this case, is defined in a real-life context. Hence, consider the real-life constraints on the two variables. Both time and volume should be non-negative. In other words,
.
.
The first condition is an inequality about , which is indeed the independent variable.
However, the second condition is about , the dependent variable of this function. It has to be rewritten as a condition about .
![\begin{aligned} f(t) &\ge 0 &&\text{Assumption} \cr 80000 - 16000\, t& \ge 0 && \text{Definition of} ~ f \cr 80000 & \ge 16000\, t && \begin{aligned}&\text{Add $16000\, t$} \\[-0.5em] & \text{to both sides of the inequality}\end{aligned} \cr 5 &\ge t &&\begin{aligned}&\text{Divide both sides of} \\[-0.5em] & \text{the inequality by $16000$}\end{aligned} \cr t &\le 5 && \text{Flip the inequality}\end{aligned}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cbegin%7Baligned%7D%20f%28t%29%20%26%5Cge%200%20%26%26%5Ctext%7BAssumption%7D%20%5Ccr%2080000%20-%2016000%5C%2C%20t%26%20%5Cge%200%20%26%26%20%5Ctext%7BDefinition%20of%7D%20~%20f%20%5Ccr%2080000%20%26%20%5Cge%2016000%5C%2C%20t%20%26%26%20%5Cbegin%7Baligned%7D%26%5Ctext%7BAdd%20%2416000%5C%2C%20t%24%7D%20%5C%5C%5B-0.5em%5D%20%26%20%5Ctext%7Bto%20both%20sides%20of%20the%20inequality%7D%5Cend%7Baligned%7D%20%5Ccr%205%20%26%5Cge%20t%20%26%26%5Cbegin%7Baligned%7D%26%5Ctext%7BDivide%20both%20sides%20of%7D%20%5C%5C%5B-0.5em%5D%20%26%20%5Ctext%7Bthe%20inequality%20by%20%2416000%24%7D%5Cend%7Baligned%7D%20%5Ccr%20t%20%26%5Cle%205%20%26%26%20%5Ctext%7BFlip%20the%20inequality%7D%5Cend%7Baligned%7D)
.
Hence, t ≤ 5.
Combine the two inequalities to obtain the domain:
0 ≤ t ≤ 5.
<u><em>Answers:</em></u>
The corresponding angles of the triangles are congruent
The image is a reduction of the pre-image
Neither the dilation nor the rotation change the shape of the triangle
<u><em>Explanation:</em></u>
<u>For shapes to be similar:</u>
1- there should be a ratio between the sides
2- angles in first shape should be congruent to angles in second shape
Now, a scale factor of 0.2 means that the sides of the image are 0.2 of the length of the original shape. However, angles are not changes
<u>Let's check the choices:</u>
<u>1- </u><span><u>The corresponding sides of the triangles are congruent:</u>
This option is incorrect as dilation changes the lengths of the sides
<u>2- </u></span><span><u>The corresponding angles of the triangles are congruent:</u>
This option is correct as neither dilation nor rotation alters the measures of the angles
<u>3- </u></span><span><u>The corresponding sides of the image are 5 times as long as those of the pre-image:</u>
This option is incorrect as the sides of the image are only 0.2 times as long as those of the pre-image
<u>4- </u></span><span><u>The image is a reduction of the pre-image:</u>
This option is correct as the sides of the image are 0.2 times those of the pre-image which means that the shape is reduced
<u>5- </u></span><span><u>Neither the dilation nor the rotation change the shape of the triangle:</u>
This option is correct as both dilation and rotation are rigid transformations that do not alter the shape of the triangle (a triangle remains a triangle only with different side lengths)
<u>6- </u></span><u>The rotation reduces the size of the triangle:</u>
This option is incorrect as rotation does not alter the size of the shape. It only changes its position
Hope this helps :)
The answer to the question is b
$9 each hour she works + 7.50 fee
$7.50+$9h= $34.50
