I’m guessing they will use the popular votes.
Answer:
on grounds of 'Equal Protection' laws of the 14th Amendment.
Explanation:
Both Brown V. Board of Education and parents involved in Community Schools v. Seattle presented their case on grounds of 'Equal Protection' laws of the 14th Amendment.
In Brown V. Board of Education, the court ruled that 'separate but equal' was an unconstitutional provision and that the practice of segregation was 'inherently unequal'. It further ruled out that these unequal provisions violated the equal protection laws.
Similarly, the parents involved in Community Schools v. Seattle claimed and argued that racial tiebreaker in district schools subjugated and infringed 'Equal Protection' laws of the 14th Amendment.
Though the initial plan of the racial tiebreaker system was to prevent racial imbalance in schools, the court adjudged that the system was unconstitutional because it, more or less, contributed to unequal opportunity in getting admissions.
Answer:
humanistic
Explanation:
Humanistic approach to psychology: The humanistic perspective was introduced by Carl Rogers and Abraham Maslow.
It highlighted the good and empathetic nature of human behavior. It helps the psychologist to increase a person's self-actualization or self-image while taking psychotherapy or counseling session. Self-actualization or self-image or self-efficacy is the basis that makes a person feel worthwhile. It helps a person to maximize his or her well-being and to fulfill potential.
Dennis’s explanation is reflective of the humanistic approach to psychology.
I Mexican cowboy is called a charro
charreada is a rodeo
