Using two negatives usually turns the thought or sentence into a positive one. Double negatives are generally discouraged in English because they are considered to be poor grammar and they can be confusing. However, they are sometimes used in everyday casual speech and you'll find many examples in popular song lyrics.
A double negative is a statement that contains two bad phrases. If negatives are used in one sentence, the other means may be conveyed. in lots of British, American, and other dialects, two or extra negatives can be used with an unmarried bad which means.
The mixture of the preposition of and a possessive form—either a noun finishing in -'s or a possessive pronoun—is called a double genitive (or double possessive). And while it can appear overly possessive, the development has been around for centuries and it is perfectly accurate.
A double negative sentence has one phrase which flips the meaning of the relaxation, and another which flips it properly returned again. However, it normally reasons more confusion when it's miles used than when it isn't always - and negatives can sneak in thru such expressions as "fail to" or "underestimate" as well as "uns" and "nots".
Learn more about Double negatives here brainly.com/question/16316435
#SPJ4
Answer:
True.
Explanation:
The case about which the question is referring to is Griswold v. Connecticut.
The Griswold v. Connecticut was the case in which Estelle Griswold, an Executive Director of the Planned Parenthood League of Connecticut and Dr C. Lee Buxton opened a clinic to counsel the married couples educating and counselling them about preventing contraception.
In Connecticut, the use of contraception or giving counselling about the same was a punishable offence with a fine of $50. Griswold and Buxton had challenged this law of Connecticut and were arrested with a fine. After there case being upheld in Appellate Division Court and Connecticut Supreme Court, Griswold appealed her case in the Supreme Court of the United States in 1965. In the same year, the Supreme Court gave a verdict in favour of Griswold based on the 14th Amendment of the Due Process which gives a right to privacy.
So, the answer is true.
Most likely it's social anxiety disorder i'd say
Answer:
- 1) Higher prices than in competitive markets Monopolies face inelastic demand and so can increase prices – giving consumers no alternative.
- 2) A decline in consumer surplus.
- 3) Monopolies have fewer incentives to be efficient.
- 4) Possible diseconomies of scale. Explanation:
<h3>Hope this answer will help you.</h3>