Answer:
It can help to close the gap in social inequality
Explanation:
Education does not immediately mean that one would become rich because sometimes people are well educated but have no jobs or underpaying jobs.
But education has a big role to play in the fight foe social equality. One of the goals of education is that it is a means to a free and a just society.
With this in mind, education and social justice have a relationship. A lack of education means a lack of social justice.
A world class education system is key to reduction in social inequality
Answer:
d) analyzing data collecting by others
Explanation:
Answer:
dissonant colors heighten the emotional impact
Explanation:
Ernst Ludwig Kirchner was a famous painter who painted the Berlin Street in the year 1913 before World War I. His oil paintings depicted the relationship between men and women. He also showed the then present chaotic life of the people through his paintings.
Kirchner's Expressionistic paintings represented a very powerful reaction against the Impressionism. Kirchner's paintings is characteristic of Expressionism because it lacks the harmony in it that signifies the emotional life of the people was suffering before the World War I. This made him very famous.
Hence the answer is ---
dissonant colors heighten the emotional impact
Answer:
Role construct repertory test
Explanation:
A role construct repertory test was proposed by Kelly. This test is about an individual to understand his/her world around him and to know the people who are around him.
This test allows a person to describe himself in his way. In this test, the person has to tell the name of the person whom he knows. After that, the person has to compare himself from the listed three people whom he knows. For instance, a person can compare with father, mother, and self and tell about the similarities and dissimilarities among three people.
Answer:
Religion declines with economic development. In a previous post that rattled around the Internet, I presented a scholarly explanation for this pattern: people who feel secure in this world have less interest in another one.
The basic idea is that wealth allows people to feel more secure in the sense that they are confident of having their basic needs met and expect to lead a long healthy life. In such environments, there is less of a market for religion, the primary function of which is to help people cope with stress and uncertainty.
Some readers of the previous post pointed out that the U.S. is something of an anomaly because this is a wealthy country in which religion prospers. Perhaps taking the view that one swallow makes a summer, the commentators concluded that the survival of religion here invalidates the security hypothesis. I do not agree.
Explanation:
The first point to make is that the connection between affluence and the decline of religious belief is as well-established as any such finding in the social sciences. In research of this kind, the preferred analysis strategy is some sort of line-fitting exercise. No researcher ever expects every case to fit exactly on the line, and if they did, something would be seriously wrong.
