Answer:
it arrives at 1:45
Step-by-step explanation:
since it is 10:40, we will ad 3 hours, 11, 12, 1.
Then, we still have the 40, and will have to add the 5 minutes because of the 3 hours and 5 minutes.
Giving us, 1:45
Answer:
- The surface area of Cylinder B is 16 times the surface area of Cylinder A
Step-by-step explanation:
<u>Note</u>: <em>It is assumed we are looking at the total surface area (but the answer would be same for both cases)</em>
<h3>Given</h3>
- Cylinders A with radius - r, height - h,
- Cylinder B with radius - 4r, height - 4h.
<h3>To find </h3>
- The ratio of total surface areas of cylinder B to A
<h3>Solution</h3>
Total surface area of cylinder A is:
Total surface area of cylinder B is:
Find the ratio of areas:
<span>Sample space for hits: {0, 1, 2, 3}
Expected hits: 0.45
Variance: 0.3775
We have 3 guns, each of which can either hit or miss. The sample space for the number of hits is {0, 1, 2, 3}
The expected number of hits is 0.20 + 0.15 + 0.10 = 0.45 hits
For the variance, let's calculate the probability of 0, 1, 2, or 3 hits.
0 hits:
0.80 * 0.85 * 0.90 = 0.612
1 hit:
0.8 * 0.85 * 0.1 + 0.8 * 0.15 * 0.9 + 0.2 * 0.85 * 0.9 = 0.068 + 0.108 + 0.153 = 0.329
2 hits:
0.8 * 0.15 * 0.1 + 0.2 * 0.85 * 0.1 + 0.2 * 0.15 * 0.9 = 0.012 + 0.017 + 0.027 = 0.056
3 hits:
0.2 * 0.15 * 0.1 = 0.003
Since we have 4 discrete outcomes, the variance is simply the sum of the probability of the event multiplied by the square of the difference between the value of the event minus the mean. So
0.612 * (0 - 0.45)^2 + 0.329 * (1 - 0.45)^2 + 0.056 * (2 - 0.45)^2 + 0.003 * (3 - 0.45)^2
= 0.612 * (-0.45)^2 + 0.329 * (0.55)^2 + 0.056 * (1.55)^2 + 0.003 * (2.55)^2
= 0.612 * 0.2025 + 0.329 * 0.3025 + 0.056 * 2.4025 + 0.003 * 6.5025
= 0.12393 + 0.0995225 + 0.13454 + 0.0195075
= 0.3775
So the variance is 0.3775
Note: I could have eliminated the step consolidating the probabilities of getting 0, 1, 2, or 3 hits and instead went directly into the calculation of the variance using the probability of each of the 8 possible events. But in doing so that would have made the calculations twice as large and still would have gotten the same effect. Effectively for the cases of 1 and 2 hits, I calculated (p1 + p2 + p3)*(1 - 0.45)^2 instead of p1*(1 - 0.45)^2 + p2*(1 - 0.45)^2 + p3*(1 - 0.45)^2 which the distributive property allows us and will give the same result.</span>
Answer:
a = 1
b = -1
c = 1
discriminant = -3
x axis = 0
Step-by-step explanation:
i hope this helps
