C because adjacent angles share a common line as do angles 2 and 4.
Hope this helps :)
Answer: 2,243.4
Step-by-step explanation:
Thet contradict each other, that's why both of them are incorrect.
<span>Suppose that a polynomial has four roots: s, t, u, and v. If the polynomial were evaluated at any of these values, it would have to be zero. Therefore, the polynomial can be written in this form.
p(x)(x - s)(x - t)(x - u)(x - v), where p(x) is some non-zero polynomial
This polynomial has a degree of at least 4. It therefore cannot be cubic.
Now prove Kelsey correct. We have already proved that there can be no more than three roots. To prove that a cubic polynomial with three roots is possible, all we have to do is offer a single example of that. This one will do.
(x - 1)(x - 2)(x - 3)
This is a cubic polynomial with three roots, and four or more roots are not possible for a cubic polynomial. Kelsey is correct.
Incidentally, if this is a roller coaster we are discussing, then a cubic polynomial is not such a good idea, either for a vertical curve or a horizontal curve. I hope this helps</span><span>
</span>
Answer:
I'm pretty sure it's the first one. If i'm wrong i am terribly sorry
Step-by-step explanation:
I believe the equation is
![4 \sqrt[4]{2x} + 6 \sqrt[4]{2x}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=4%20%5Csqrt%5B4%5D%7B2x%7D%20%2B%206%20%20%5Csqrt%5B4%5D%7B2x%7D%20)
In this case, you would simplify it by adding them together.
=
![10 \sqrt[4]{2x}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=10%20%20%5Csqrt%5B4%5D%7B2x%7D%20)
And can even be changed to an exponential equation:
