Answer:
a. The fewer risk factors the better, so their unborn child is likely to be better off even with the limited help the social worker provided.
Explanation:
According to a different source, these are the options that come with this question:
a. The fewer risk factors the better, so their unborn child is likely to be better off even with the limited help the social worker provided.
b. Their unborn child is not likely to be benefited by eliminating only one risk factor.
c. The unborn child might have been benefited if prenatal care were found, but improving prenatal nutrition is not important.
d. The health care and stress factors will only be important after the child is born.
In this example, the social worker is not able to help Robert and Nadine with all their problems. The couple still needs to find work and prenatal care. However, the social worker was able to help them find enough food to eat. Although the baby still faces some risks, the fewer risks, the better. Therefore, he is still better off than he was before thanks to the limited help of the social worker.
<span>The
second-place team members were disappointed but had gained new confidence in their ability to compete at a world-class </span>and only one team went to the Olympics and earned
a medal there if <span>two U.S. sailing teams that
competed and<span> cooperated with each other while
training for the Olympics.</span></span>
Answer: b. habituation
Explanation:
Habituation is a psychological learning process that is described as a decrement in the response to a specific stimulus after being regularly exposed to it. It´s associated with the nervous system and may happen unconsciously. In this example, Max filtering out the fan's noise that was previously so distracting is an effect of habituation.
This was done in order for the doctors to be sure that they have the best subject for the experiment. The doctors will have a basis for comparison in order to measure the effects of the procedure after it is done.
<em>Hope this helped! :)</em>
