Answer:
The contradiction exists at the moment when the narrator affirms that in emio the scarcity of food, the grains of the peasants were seized.
Explanation:
A text presents a contradiction when it presents an incompatibility between two premises, where one cancels the meaning of the other or leaves that meaning imprecise and unreliable. An example of this can be seen in the text shown in the question above, in the lines "In fact, food supplies were so short that Lenin had to send the secret police, the 'Cheka', into the countryside to seize the grain supplies of peasants, "where the narrator says there was a severe shortage of food, but then he says the peasants had enough grain to be seized.
Answer:
The answer is B, the power of Supreme Court
The farmers would support the populist Party belief in 1896 when "Farmers would see higher crop prices due to inflation."
This is evident in the fact that the Populist party advocate for the government to place the value of the dollar-based on Silver.
This would then make the prices of products sold at inflated prices, thereby making the farmers earn more revenue and, in turn, can pay their debt.
Option A is wrong because the Populist Party did not advocate for equal transportation fees.
Option B is wrong because the Populist Party did not advocate for loans for individuals from the national banks.
Option C is wrong because the populist party did not advocate for subsidies for railroad owners.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that the correct answer is option D. "Farmers would see higher crop prices due to inflation."
Learn more here: brainly.com/question/18169827
The answer is thematic maps
