Answer:
1. I broke my promise of buying my younger one an Ice-cream when she recovered from her illness. I rather bought her a toy.
2. I lied about not knowing the whereabouts of a man who was to be punished for belonging to a particular religion.
Explanation:
1. The moral theory of utilitarianism will justify the first scenario. This theory states that an action or policy is right if it maximizes happiness or results in the greater good of society. The action I took in the first case resulted in the greater good of my sister because a cup of ice cream would not be healthy for her who was just recovering from an illness. Therefore, that decision was for her greater good.
2. The Deontology theory that states that having a morally justifiable intent is better than obtaining the right results will justify my action. For me, it was not morally right that a man should be punished for his religion and that superseded telling the truth about the man's whereabouts.
Answer:
As Nepal is locked by India and China geographically, Nepal does not have direct access to sea and other third country. So, it is entitled to get access to transit. ... Geographically, India is more feasible for Nepal to transfer goods and services via road. It does not mean China is not important for Nepal.
Explanation:
# LIVE NEAR NEPAL
Answer:
the Three-Fifths Compromise
Explanation:
Japan can be very dangerous and bad...if society gets better...There will be less crime
i need to get a brainliest to get into next level...please give brainliest
Answer:
SO an example can be Lagos in Nigeria.
Push factors: Unhygeniec, Informal employment, Only one primary school in the area, Lack of safety.
Pull factors: Good community, Electricity for cooking, Theres lighting, Cheaper economy.
Explanation: