1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
zalisa [80]
2 years ago
15

In this exercise, you will practice Identifying a fallacy that is usually referred to as the appeal to unqualified authority fal

lacy. This fallacy is often classified as a fallacy of weak Induction. In general, fallaces of weak induction mimic the forms of typical Inductive arguments but rely on premises that are clearly inadequate to support a proposed conclusion. In particular, an appeal to unqualified authority fallacy mimics the form of a typical argument from authority, but the authority cited is someone whose expertise is inadequate to justity belief in the conclusion. Consider the following argumentative passage and indicate (i) whether it commits a fallacy and (ii) whether, specifically, it commits an appeal to unqualified authority fallacy. (Note: It is possible for a single argument to commit more than one type of fallacy. Also, if an argument commits a different fallacy altogether, indicate that it does commit a fallacy, but not the appeal to unqualified authority fallacy.Albert Einstein argued that the United States should not try to pursue a monopoly on nuclear weapons but instead should equip the United Nations with nuclear weapons for the sole purpose of maintaining deterrence. Einstein was a Nobel Prize winner and often was cited as one of the greatest scientific minds in history. The United States should have followed his advice with regard to nuclear weapons. Passage _________commit a fallacy; specifically, it__________ commit an appeal to unqualified authority fallacy,
Social Studies
1 answer:
Lisa [10]2 years ago
5 0

Answer:

Passage above commit a fallacy; specifically, it argument commit an appeal.

Explanation:

Fallacy is where there are no specific reasons for a certain statement. When an argument is written there is some force which is convince to believe the argument.

You might be interested in
When people allowed the example of others to validate how to think, feel, and act, cialdini (2008) called this the _______ princ
SashulF [63]

When people allowed the example of others to validate how to think, feel, and act, Cialdini (2008) called this the consistency principle of persuasion.

The coherence principle states that people are motivated by cognitive coherence and change their attitudes, beliefs, perceptions, and behaviors to achieve it. Robert Cialdini and his research team found that Cialdini I have done extensive research on what I call the Consistency of Belief Principle.

Simply put, the principle of consistency is that once an organization, and more specifically accounting or an accounting department, adopts an accounting principle or method for documenting and reporting information, it must apply that method consistently. It means you should keep using it.

Learn more about the consistency principle of persuasion. here: brainly.com/question/13985660

#SPJ4

7 0
2 years ago
What are the types of Human Resources? Name
serious [3.7K]

Answer:

a

Explanation:

air food water

3 0
3 years ago
How are masculine and/or feminine identities performed at school?
Volgvan

Answer:

Different gender identities are performed through different school uniforms, manners, and special activities such as clubs or classes at school.

8 0
3 years ago
What is extreme connectedness and how does buchanan reply to the claim that we are extremely connected?
Charra [1.4K]
<span>extreme connectedness is the theory that in enhancing the bad parts of human nature, we will inadvertently destroy the good parts. buchanan supports the idea that we are all extremely connected.</span>
5 0
3 years ago
When a lane change must be made, look ____________________. Glance behind to check ________________. Always _____________ lane c
Kitty [74]

Answer:

1. At the review mirror.

2. Blind spots.

3. Signal.

Explanation:

When driving an automobile and a driver decided to have a lane change, he or she must understand and do three things always. These things are the following:

1. When a lane change must be made, look AT THE REVIEW MIRROR.

2. Glance behind to check BLIND SPOTS.

3. Always SIGNAL lane changes.

6 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • The fourth amendment contains two critical legal concepts: a prohibition against unreasonable searches and seizures and:
    5·1 answer
  • Abed is 12 months old, and his uncle Nadin is visiting for the first time in 6 months. Nadin is delighted to see his nephew, so
    7·1 answer
  • Janis was a young mother in her late 20s when she and her husband divorced, forcing her to live on her sole income as a part tim
    7·1 answer
  • Why do oligopolies exist? List five or six oligopolists whose products you own or regularly purchase. What distinguishes oligopo
    11·1 answer
  • What was the constatutional amendment that outlawed slavery and indentured survitude?
    14·1 answer
  • Goes to the store purchases a DVD player The shopper is buying both a
    13·1 answer
  • A nonreligious set of laws established by a nation to provide order is known as __________.
    12·2 answers
  • State any 5 characteristic of present society​
    7·1 answer
  • Peking and Beijing are ________.
    9·1 answer
  • 1. Why is environmental pollution a negative aspect?
    14·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!