Whenever a research is done, you must reject or accept a null hypothesis (the one you consider is not correct) or your work hypothesis (the theory you think is must probably accurate or close to the truth) usually, when performing a research, you will not always obtain positive or statistically significant results, that validate your hypothesis. Is actually, not unusual that extremes (or extraordinary results) come out (unexpected for several reasons: incorrect size of the sample, improper selection of the subjects- a bias- lack of correct determination of the variable measured or failure to determine the type of the variable-numerical, categorical, ratio,etc-)
Positive or negative results are yet, results whether they prove or reject your hypothesis. Failing to establish a scientific hypothesis does not necessarily mean that they did something wrong, it just says that the hypothesis tested does not approach correctly to the epistemological truth (ultimately, any research is only a mere approximation to reality). Therefore, when two scientists deny sharing<em> unusual results</em>, they are acting unethically, hiding results that can mean something from a different point of view.
reference
Nicholson, R. S. (1989). On being a scientist. Science, 246(4928), 305-306.
Answer:
A. she was given the unfortunate nickname because she had 300 protestant heretics burned at the stake.
The Oldest Son usually takes over
3 All citizens have to pay taxes, serve on juries etc
5 you have to be 18 or older to vote
4 Bill of rights = rights of citizens
1 each branch is checked by the other ones to make sure the power is balanced
2 power is separated so that one person doesn't have all of it therefore reducing corruption
Answer:
b)
Explanation:
Sensitive issues refer to topics which people tend to feel uncomfortable talking about (Like harassment, addictions, violence)
Many studies on this topic have shown that when people are in front of other person who's interviewing them they might hide some aspects of themselves to create a better impression on the interviewer, therefore, the information acquired this way is not 100% right.
Regarding <u>sensitive issues, it is even more difficult for people to talk about them specially when it comes to an stranger</u> (like a researcher). Thus, it is not recommended to address sensitive issues in interviews but rather by <u>self-administered questionnaires in which the person doesn't have to interact with another person.</u>
<u />
When it comes to complicated issues, a questionnaire is not recommended since it could leave the researcher without enough information, and since it's <u>a complicated issue, the researcher might want to be there to clarify people's answers.</u> Therefore, <u>for complicated issues, it is better to use interviews.</u>
Thus, the correct answer is b) Use self-administered questionnaires for sensitive issues and interviews for complicated issues
