All categories

3 years ago

It is too late to remedy air pollution. a. True b. False

Social Studies

2 answers:

Nataly_w [17]3 years ago

7 0

FALSE.

Air pollution is a worldwide problem that has occurred as the world population has increased and cities have developed with the fossil fuel energy base.

Howerver, it's never too late to take action to remedy this situation. Especially because air quality can be made even worse if governments do not adopt public policies and if the population does not become aware of it.

In addition, it is possible that the situation will improve. The change in energy matrix seems to be the way. There are now several ways to get clean fuel such as wind, solar and electric energy. However, the production of clean energy on a large scale is still expensive.

Evgesh-ka [11]3 years ago

3 0

False. Its never too late to fix a mistake unless the damage is immense. As far as we could see, not much damage has happened, so we need to remedy air pollution quick before its a problem.

You might be interested in

Does the constitution address all of the concerns that arose during the time of articles of confederation? Why or why not?

nataly862011 [7]

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

Although there are no options attached we can say the following.

I consider that the constitution addresses most of the concerns that arose during the time of articles of confederation?

Let's remember that the Articles of Confederation was the first Constitution of the United States. It had thirteen sections. Both the most relevant articles were:

2.- The sovereignty of the states that had their own powers in their territory.

4.- Free pass for American colonists when traveling across the states, except for criminals.

6.- Central government power to make international treaties and the power of the states to raise an army.

7.- The states decide their military leaders.

8.- The states are the ones who could collect money through taxation. The central government needed money, it had to ask for it from the states.

This meant that the central government was week under the Articles of Confederation and Congress could not collect money through taxation. When the government needed money it had to ask for it from the states. It could not raise an army, either.

That is why delegates met at the Constitutional Convention of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania in 1787. Federalists and Antifederalists debated on the new form of government for the country and created the Constitution.

Federalists supported a strong form of government. Antid¿federalists, not. For states to sign it, Antifederalists like Thomas Jefferson demanded to include many rights for the citizens and respect to the sovereignty of the states. That is why Federalists James Madison drafted the Bill of Rights, the first ten Amendments to the United States Constitution.

8 0

3 years ago

In the past, how did professional baseball teams generally choose whichplayer they would take and how much money they would pay

Gennadij [26K]

They would choose based on what tale nt scouts would say about the player and with it determine his ability and salary

8 0

3 years ago

Dr. winters is considered one of the most prominent obstetricians in town. she has just delivered her one thousandth baby. dr. w

Butoxors [25]

The answer is "Generativity versus stagnation" stage of development.

Generativity versus stagnation is the seventh of eight phases of Erik Erikson's hypothesis of psychosocial advancement. This stage happens amid center adulthood between the periods of around 40 and 65.
Generativity alludes to "making your stamp" on the world through watching over others and also making and achieving things that improve the world a place.
Stagnation alludes to the inability to figure out how to contribute. These people may feel detached or uninvolved with their group and with society overall.

4 0

3 years ago

As the nation grew and new states were added to the union, what challenges did this present regarding slavery?

xenn [34]

Throughout the first half of the nineteenth century, the Northern and Southern regions of the United States struggled to find a mutually acceptable solution to the slavery issue. Unfortunately, little common ground could be found. The cotton-oriented economy of the American South continued to rest on the shoulders of its slaves, even as Northern calls for the abolition of slavery grew louder. At the same time, the industrialization of the North continued. During the 1820s and 1830s, the different needs of the two regions' economies further strained relations between the North and the South.

The first half of the nineteenth century was also a period of great expansion for the United States. In 1803, the nation purchased the vast Louisiana Territory from France, and in the late 1840s it wrestled Texas and five hundred thousand square miles of land in western North America from Mexico. But in both of these cases, the addition of new land deepened the bitterness between the North and the South. As each new state and territory was admitted into the Union, the two sides engaged in furious arguments over whether slavery would be permitted within its borders. Urged on by the growing abolitionist movement, Northerners became determined to halt the spread of slavery. Southern slaveholders fiercely resisted, however, because they knew that they would be unable to stop antislavery legislation in the U.S. Congress if some of the new states were not admitted as slave states. In order to preserve the Union, the two sides agreed to a series of compromis

4 0

3 years ago

A print shop makes designer shirts. The shop buys its ink in bulk from a

olchik [2.2K]

I think it is D
Hope this help you?!

5 0

3 years ago