A
C
A
C
B
C
Those are the answers to those in respective order
Answer:
The correct answer is - biological; social-cognitive
Explanation:
If Darcy emphasizes the gene-environment interaction for her research about deciding which theoretical perspective on personality is a more sensible perspective then she is focusing on the biological perspective as genes are the biological unit of hereditary and responsible for traits.
if she emphasizes the importance of how mental or psychological processes affect personality, then she is focusing on socio-cognitive perspective as it depends on social interaction on personality.
Answer:A plea bargain
Explanation:
A plea bargain refers to a negotiation that is made between a defendant and a prosecutor in which a defendant is advised to plead guilty so that they can get a lesser sentences than when they don't plead guilty. This may go along with some conditions such as doing community service. A plea deal gives some benefits to a defendant that will lessen what would have been a worse penalty for their action. This is however dependent on the condition that a defendant will not break any conditions mentioned under a plea deal.
Plea bargain are accused of being a way of letting guilty guys go free ,when a person who isn't actual guilt plead guilty to a crime they didn't commit.
The Democratic party currently reflects "liberal" voter positions comparatively speaking.
Answer: The correct answer is <em>True.</em>
Explanation:
Tortious conduct is also known as tortious interference. This occurs when a person or group interferes with a contract of another person that will cause financial harm.
A third party can convince someone to leave a deal right before the deal is legally bound. The third party can offer incentives to the group or person to leave that deal. This can also happen during a sale of goods or property when the person or group has not yet signed the papers but are in the last stages of negotiation.
The most common form of tortious conduct is when a person uses blackmail, offers a lower price, or refuses to transport goods to get someone to break their contract with the third party. If there is enough proof of this, a judge can determine if there was tortious conduct.
