Answer: Steady OR Flashing
Explanation: If you are talking about the internet connection / power received lines One light should be Solid or "Steady" and the other usually green light will be flashing indicating that data is being transferred. Beware that just because the Orange light is Steady that does not mean that the internet is working that just means that it sees its connected.
Answer:
The purpose of this act was to reduce workplace hazards and implement more safety and health programs for both employers and their employees.
Answer:
Explanation:
The following is written in Java. It creates the function num_eights and uses recursion to check how many times the digit 8 appears in the number passed as an argument. A test case has been created in the main method and the output can be seen in the image below highlighted in red.
public static int num_eights(int pos){
if (pos == 0)
return 0;
if (pos % 10 == 8)
return 1 + num_eights(pos / 10);
else
return num_eights(pos / 10);
}
Answer:
Theoretically Yes
Explanation:
The data given is linearly separable. So, the subset of the data will also be linearly separable. And it will pass for all training dataset. However, you should definitely never expect such thing In any real-life problem because the data is noisy, for a bazilion of reasons, so no model is guaranteed to perform perfectly.
Answer:Technology law scholars have recently started to consider the theories of affordance and technological mediation, imported from the fields of psychology, human-computer interaction (HCI), and science and technology studies (STS). These theories have been used both as a means of explaining how the law has developed, and more recently in attempts to cast the law per se as an affordance. This exploratory paper summarises the two theories, before considering these applications from a critical perspective, noting certain deficiencies with respect to potential normative application and definitional clarity, respectively. It then posits that in applying them in the legal context we should seek to retain the relational user-artefact structure around which they were originally conceived, with the law cast as the user of the artefact, from which it seeks certain features or outcomes. This approach is effective for three reasons. Firstly, it acknowledges the power imbalance between law and architecture, where the former is manifestly subject to the decisions, made by designers, which mediate and transform the substance of the legal norms they instantiate in technological artefacts. Secondly, from an analytical perspective, it can help avoid some of the conceptual and definitional problems evident in the nascent legal literature on affordance. Lastly, approaching designers on their own terms can foster better critical evaluation of their activities during the design process, potentially leading to more effective ‘compliance by design’ where the course of the law’s mediation by technological artefacts can be better anticipated and guided by legislators, regulators, and legal practitioners.
Keywords
Affordance, technological mediation, postphenomenology, legal theory, compliance by design, legal design
