When Jesus reached the famous well at Shechem and asked a Samaritan woman for a drink, she replied full of surprise: "Jews do not associate with Samaritans” (John 4:9). In the ancient world, relations between Jews and Samaritans were indeed strained. Josephus reports a number of unpleasant events: Samaritans harass Jewish pilgrims traveling through Samaria between Galilee and Judea, Samaritans scatter human bones in the Jerusalem sanctuary, and Jews in turn burn down Samaritan villages. The very notion of “the good Samaritan” (Luke 10:25-37) only makes sense in a context in which Samaritans were viewed with suspicion and hostility by Jews in and around Jerusalem.
It is difficult to know when the enmity first arose in history—or for that matter, when Jews and Samaritans started seeing themselves (and each other) as separate communities. For at least some Jews during the Second Temple period, 2Kgs 17:24-41 may have explained Samaritan identity: they were descendants of pagan tribes settled by the Assyrians in the former <span>northern kingdom </span>of Israel, the region where most Samaritans live even today. But texts like this may not actually get us any closer to understanding the Samaritans’ historical origins.
The Samaritans, for their part, did not accept any scriptural texts beyond the Pentateuch. Scholars have known for a long time about an ancient and distinctly Samaritan version of the Pentateuch—which has been an important source for textual criticism of the Bible for centuries. In fact, a major indication for a growing Samaritan self-awareness in antiquity was the insertion of "typically Samaritan" additions into this version of the Pentateuch, such as a Decalogue commandment to build an altar on Mount Gerizim, which Samaritans viewed as the sole “place of blessing” (see also Deut 11:29, Deut 27:12). They fiercely rejected Jerusalem—which is not mentioned by name in the Pentateuch—and all Jerusalem-related traditions and institutions such as kingship and messianic eschatology.
To acquire approval to conduct an experiment with subjects from her undergraduate psychology course, a student researcher needs to submit an application to the university's institutional review board.
The purpose of the institutional review board review is to make sure that the appropriate steps are taken to protect the rights and welfare of subjects who are engaging in research, both beforehand and via ongoing assessment. Institutional review boards (IRBs) are tasked with reviewing all research involving human beings in order to protect their rights and welfare.
According to 45 CFR 46.103, the Institutional review boards must assess and approve any non-exempt human subject study. The researcher might not be allowed to use the data and other material gathered throughout the research process if the Institutional review board's permission was not obtained prior to performing the study.
Learn more about institutional review board:
brainly.com/question/5142341
#SPJ4
Answer:
The correct answer is A. Conscientiousness.
Explanation:
Conscientiousness is one of the 5 personality traits classified in the Big Five personality traits, it can be described as the personality trait of being diligent, careful, organized and reliable.
People that are high on conscientiousness are perceived as more responsible, reliable and ethical than those who score low on conscientiousness.
Conscientious people tend to be efficient and also tend to achieve professional success.
In conclusion, the tendency to be reliable and ethical is closely associated with the Conscientiousness trait of the Big Five Personality traits.
Answer: Innocent until proven guilty
Explanation: Innocent until tried and proven guilty in the court of law. In most cases they are suspects and as trial goes on, some are remanded in detention until proven guilty due to the severity of the crime committed but in most cases such suspects are innocent until proven guilty.
Answer: 4 per m2
<span>To find out the population density of a certain
species, you must divide the number of organisms living in that habitat over
how big the area is. In this case, because there are 20 mice in an ecosystem
that is 5 square-meters big, then there would be 4 mice in every square-meter.</span>
