The Missouri Compromise (1820) was a compromise that was reached between the North and the South and approved by the country. The 24th state to be admitted was Missouri thanks to Congress (1821). The protracted inter-sectional conflict over the expansion of slavery that eventually resulted in the American Civil War began at that time.
What was the Missouri Compromise?
A law known as the Missouri Compromise of 1820 attempted to alleviate escalating tensions between sections of society over the subject of slavery. The United States enacted the bill, which President James Monroe then signed. Maine was admitted as a free state, and Missouri, a state that permitted slavery, was added to the Union by Congress. The remaining Louisiana Purchase territories north of the 36o 30' line were also exempt from the slavery restriction (the southern border of Missouri). Just over 30 years would pass until the Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854 abolished the Missouri Compromise. The compromise was declared unconstitutional by the Supreme Court in the Dred Scott decision in 1857, which opened the door for the Civil War.
To know more about Missouri Compromise check out:
brainly.com/question/14383383
#SPJ4
Answer:
According to MyPlate, the sugar-sweetened soft drink is empty calories.
Explanation:
Empty calories come from both added sugars and solid fats. They are called empty because they just <em>add calories </em><em>without </em><em>any other </em><em>nutritional value. </em>
Unlike the soft drink, the almonds, chocolate pudding and hard-cooked eggs all carry a certain nutritional value, some more than others, as well as calories. These are not empty ones.
Answer:
.................................
<span> long- run consequences</span>
Answer:
Metaethical relativism is a concept that explains that moral judgments are relative to a particular condition or standpoint and can not be true or false in a complete sense. So scientists believe in some sort of beliefs, influence, customs and that makes the judgment that is relative to a particular standpoint.
Metaethical objectivism is free from a particular standpoint and completely based on one moral ground or principle. Here mathematical relativism focuses on ethical judgment.
Situation relativism is a concept or approach that based on relative situations and mindset rather than legalistic approaches. Therefore, there is no word like perfect or never in this approach.
Situation absolutism is totally based on ethics and principle irrespective of situation or condition and focus only on what is right or wrong.