Answer:
it as a liner function that is why we should choose to point in order to find the liner equation
y=2/3x+1
The problem deals with fractions comparison, lets do it:
21/30 > 2/3
we begin solving:
21 > (2/3)*30
21 > 2*10
<span>21 > 20
</span>therefore the proposed inequality is true, <span>21/30 > 2/3
You can solve as well getting same denominator for both fractions and comparing directly, in this case we need to get 2/3 to be divided by 30:
2/3 = (10/10)(2/3) = 20/30
So we have:
</span><span>21/30 > 2/3
</span>which is equal to:
<span>21/30 > 20/30
</span>and we compare directly because both fractions are divided by the same number, and we can see that the inequality is true.
Answer:
(4/7)÷ (3/-8). Division of fractions is the same as multiplying their reciprocals. So (4/7) x (-8/3). Now multiply the numerators together and denominators together (make sure you only use the negative sign once). (4 x -8) / (7 x 3) = -32/21
Answer:
1. 80
2. 2400
Step-by-step explanation:
1. what is the change in Dan's total pay for each copy of math is fun he sells?
2. what is Dan's total pay if he doesn't sell any copies of math is fun?
Given
y=80x + 2400
When x=0
y=80(0)+2400
=0+2400
=2400
When x=1
y=80x + 2400
=80(1) + 2400
=80+2400
=2480
change in Dan's total pay for each copy of math is fun he sells is
= 2480 - 2400
=80
2. Dan's total pay if he doesn't sell any copies of math is fun?
y=80x+2400
When x=0
y=80(0)+2400
=0+2400
=2400
<u>Answer:</u>
The correct answer option is D. He multiplied the divisor by 100 and dividend by 10.
<u>Step-by-step explanation:</u>
We are given that Miguel completed the division where initially he had to divide 754 by 0.52.
To make it easier, he multiplied both the divisor and the dividend by the same number to get rid of the decimal in the divisor.
If he multiplied the divisor by 100, he should have multiplied the dividend by 100 too. But instead, he mistakenly multiplied the divisor by 100 and dividend by 10.
