Answer:
B) convertible preferred shares
Explanation:
These are the options for the question
A) adjustable rate preferred shares
B) convertible preferred shares
C) common shares
D) corporate bonds
From the question, we are given an instance whereby One of your new clients explains that she prefers investments paying income with a fixed rate of return, but also allows for the possibility of realizing greater gain potential. In this case She would likely
favor investments in convertible preferred shares. Convertible preferred shares can be regarded as corporate fixed-income securities whereby an investor is allowed to turn into particular number of shares of the common stock of the firm after or on a specific date.Convertible preferred shares gives room for the owner so that the shares for a fixed number of shares can be exchanged.
Answer:
If this effort had no effect on the wages of its workers, one might consider this as evidence in support of:
d. neither the human-capital nor the signaling view of education.
Explanation:
The human capital view of education argues that education increases workers' productivity, which also affects some increase in workers' wages. The signaling view states that education passes a message about workers' various innate abilities to potential employers. This implies that the focus of the signaling view or theory is not the effect of education on the students but the message communicated in the labor market.
Hey friends
I believe the answer to this question would be A
Hope i helped
~Katie
This is true. She can learn the rules of the game, terms used, top tennis players, types of courts played on, the various tournaments, her favorite players.
Many people cannot play sports very well but still can be avid fans of the sport! Thank goodness!
Answer:
No impairment loss would be reported
Explanation:
The computation is shown below;
Impairment loss = carrying value - recoverable amount
Where,
The recoverable amount would be the higher amount of fair market value and value in use
So the recoverable amount would be $2,545,000
Now the impairment loss is
= $2,500,000 - $2,545,000
= -$45,000
Since the impairment loss comes in negative so no impairment would be recorded
