Which activity best demonstrates the trait of responsibility?
A. demonstrating accountability for your actions
Out of the options, demonstrating accountability for your actions is the activity that best demonstrates the trait of responsibility. Your actions are of no ones responsibility besides you, you must understand the decisions you make. All of the other options are all important but not examples of accountability.
Answer:
$270,000
Explanation:
Data provided
Quantity of products = $280,000
Total fixed costs = $800,000
Unit sales price = $16
Variable cost = $12
The computation of units must be sold is shown below:-
Contribution per unit = $16 - $12
= $4 per unit
Units must be sold = (Quantity of products + Total fixed costs) ÷ Contribution per unit
= ($280,000 + $800,000) ÷ $4
= $1,080,000 ÷ $4
= $270,000
Answer:
For comprehension purpose, I would attach options to the question:
All of the following are required resources for differentiation except:
A. Strong marketing capability B. Corporate reputation for quality. C. Product engineering. D. Intense supervision of labor.
The correct answer is Option D (Intense supervision of labor)
Explanation:
The differentiation asked in the question above is product differentiation.
Product differentiation, in Economics, talks about the efficient way a producer or seller of a product makes it unique in the market thereby creating an edge between the product and other similar ones or other products.
So, strong marketing capability exposes the strength and uniqueness of the product to prospective buyers which in turn brings sales.
Corporate reputation and product engineering are a strong boost in sales, as reputable companies and the physical appearance of a product tend to get easy acceptance in the market. While Intense supervision of labor may increase the efficiency of production but it is not to be considered as a resource for differentiation.
Answer:
Answer of each requirement is given seperatly below.
a What is the value of Siebel using the DCF method?
Value under DCF = CF * (1+growth rate)/ (WAAC" -Growth rate)
Putting values (assuming after tax earning is all in cash)
Value of SI = 25 (1+6%)/ 20%-6% = 189 million dollars
"WAAC calculation
Here WAAC is equal to cost of equity (ke) as company is debt free.
so
Ke = risk free rate + beta (risk premium)
= 5 + 2.5 (6) = 20%
b What is the value using the comparable recent transactions method?
Based on recent tansaction the value of siebel incorporated will be calculated as shown below
Value of SI = Profit afte * 10 = 25 * 10 = 250 million dollars
Publicly-traded Rand Technology, a direct competitor of Siebel's sale is taken as bench mark.
c What would be the value of the firm if we combine the results of both methods?
By combining value of both value technique we get 189 + 250 = 439 million dollars.
Answer:
B. $97000
Explanation:
Given that
Estimated selling price = 102000
Estimated selling cost = 5000
Recall that
The net realizable value which is NRV
= Estimated selling price - estimated selling cost
Thus,
NRV = 102,000 - 5000
= 97000
Therefore, the estimated net realizable value is $97000.
Note, the other parameters listed are not used in estimating NRV.