The Correct answer for Plato are
C and D
separation of the third estate from the Estates-General
formation of the first National Assembly
The answer to this question is that Paula's strategy is relatively ineffective. Rehearsal strategy in studying can help students to see the subjects more often. In rehearsal strategy it uses visualization, mnemonics, skit developments, and pre-printed response cards in order for the student to make this strategy effective.
Answer:
b. Social consensus is agreement on whether behavior is bad or good, whereas magnitude of consequences is the total harm or benefit derived from an ethical decision.
Explanation:
Social consensus can be defined as a principle or theory which is used to distinguish between what is deemed good or bad in the behavior of the people living in a society.
On the other hand, the magnitude of consequences refers to the overall harm or benefit that is associated with an ethical decision chosen by an individual or group of people.
The difference between social consensus and magnitude of consequences is that social consensus is agreement on whether behavior is bad or good, whereas magnitude of consequences is the total harm or benefit derived from an ethical decision.
A recent controversy that has tested the constitutional definition of "search and seizure" is <u>"mandatory drug testing".</u>
Search and Seizure is a methodology utilized in numerous civil law and common law legal systems by which police or different experts and their operators, who, suspecting that a wrongdoing has been carried out, begin an inquiry of a man's property and take any applicable proof found in association with the wrongdoing.
A few nations have certain arrangements in their constitutions that give general society the privilege to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures. This privilege is for the most part in view of the introduce that everybody is qualified for a sensible ideal to security.
Answer:
The correct response is "Broken windows theory".
Explanation:
- The broken window hypothesis posits that just about every major issue that goes unsupervised throughout a laboratory ecosystem tends to affect an individual's mentality to that team in regards to much more negative issues.
- Whenever the ecosystem is well maintained as well as issues were addressed as individuals emerge, this also a specific concern but rather contributes to sustained economic development and preservation.