Answer:
0.4 > 0.27
Step-by-step explanation:
0.4 is more if you look at the diagram
Answer:
a) Her rate is 1 mile per hour for Monday’s run
b) 0.447 m/second
c) In fraction 20467m/180000 seconds
Step-by-step explanation:
Speed = distance / time = 1 mile/ 1 hour
= 1 mile per hour
Her rate is 1 mile per hour for Monday’s run
part A. According to the question, the unit rate is to be expressed in miles per hour units.
Part B.
Speed = distance / time = 1 mile/ 1 hour
= 1 mile per hour
But 1 mile = 1609.34 m
and 1 hour = 3600 seconds
There fore
1 mile/ 1 hour = 1*1609.34/ 1*3600 seconds
= 0.447 m/second
Part C.
1 mile/ 1 hour =1609.34/ 3600 seconds
= 1609.34 * 100/100 * 1/3600 ( multiplying and dividing by 100 to remove the decimal)
= 160934/360000
= 20467m/180000 seconds
The first five multiples of 1 are 2,3,4,5,6,7,8, 9......
The LCM of 1 and 1 is 1
Answer:
All are Yes ^^^
Step-by-step explanation:
Got it right
To find what the value of the digit 8 is, we can start by moving from the right. In a number, the place value goes (from right to left) ones, tens, hundreds, thousands, ten-thousands, hundred-thousands, millions and so on. Now we can find out what each of the numbers is.
Since 3 is the first, that means 3 is in the ones place.
Since 9 is second, that means that 9 is in the tens place.
Since 2 is third, that means that 2 is in the hundreds place.
Since 6 is fourth, that means that 6 is in the thousands place.
Now, we have 8. Since 8 is fifth, that means that 8 is in the ten-thousands place. But that's not the value of the eight. The value of the 8 would be it's place value (10,000) times 8. 10,000 * 8 = 80,000, so the value of the digit 8 in the number 686293 is 80,000.
When applying indirect proofs, we assume the negation of the conclusion is true, and show that this assumption would lead to nonsense, or contradiction.
In our case we assume a is not smaller than 7, that is we assume a≥7.
a≥7 then, multiplying both sides by 3:
3a≥21, then, adding both sides 7:
3a+7≥28,
which is a contradiction because 3a+7 is smaller than 28.
So our assumption is wrong, which means the opposite of it is correct.
Answer: assume a≥7
