Answer:
b) households will save more because they will expect higher taxes in the future
Explanation:
The Ricardian Equivalence proposition is one of the pillars of classical economics, which sadly has proven to not work very well in the real world. According to classical economists, and their quantity theory of money plus the Ricardian Equivalence, recessions do not exist because it is impossible for them to exist. But in the real world, that is not true. Recessions exist, e.g. the US is in a recession since the first quarter of 2020 (even before the current health crisis). When real people lose their jobs or are afraid to lose their jobs, their spending habits change.
On the other hand, when real people get a tax refund or tax cut, they generally spend it, they will not save it to pay future taxes. That is why car sales increase during February after checks form the IRS are handed out.
Theoretically, classical economics is great. The problem is that we are human beings, and as such, our behavior cannot be controlled or determined by what we should or should not do. This is exactly why the velocity of money (quantitative theory of money) is not constant.
Answer:
The correct answer is the option B: branded.
Explanation:
To begin with, the term of <em>branded content</em>, in the field of marketing, refers to the practice that focuses in the creation of multimedia content that is funded or outright produced by and advertiser and whose main purpose is to give a message of the values of the company in the content created.
Secondly, the case of Lego is an example of branded content due to the fact that the company did not want to sell more products but instead <u>wanted to create a content that shows the values of the company such as imagination, being oneself and having fun</u>.
Answer:
First option will be recommended.
Explanation:
To determine which option to be taken, we calculate the net present value each option generates. The option generating higher NPV should be recommended.
- Net present value of first option = Lump sum receipt = $150,000.
- Net present value of second option will be found by discounting cash flows at investing rate 12% and calculated as followed:
+ Present value of 20 equal annual payment of $14,000 + Present value of $60,000 paid in 20 years = (14,000/12%) x [ 1 - 1.12^(-20)] + 60,000/1.12^20 = $110,792.
As net present value of the first option is higher than the second option, first option will be recommended.
True, it may be searched for keywords
Answer:
Option (a) is correct.
Explanation:
Given that,
Dividend pay in year 7, D7 = $2 per share
Growth rate of dividend, g = 2.2 percent per year
Required return, ke = 16 percent
Present value of the future dividend at year 6:
= D7 ÷ (ke - g)
= $2 ÷ (0.16 - 0.022)
= $14.49
Therefore, the present value of dividend now is as follows;
= Present value of the future dividend at year 6 × (1 + ke)^{-6}
= $14.49 × (1 + 0.16)^{-6}
= $5.95
