Answer:
1) B. The height appear to be reported because there are disproportionately more 0s and 5s.
2) A. They are likely not very accurate because they appear to be reported.
Step-by-step explanation:
The distribution table is shown below:
Last Digit Frequency
0 9
1 1
2 1
3 3
4 1
5 11
6 1
7 0
8 3
9 1
1. Based on the distribution table, we see a very disproportionate distribution. There is a high frequency of 0's and 5's. This lays credence to the heights being reported rather than measured. As such, option B is the correct answer
<u>B. The height appear to be reported because there are disproportionately more 0s and 5s</u>.
2. Since the heights were reported and not measured, they are most certainly not accurate. The conclusion is that the result is not accurate. As such, option A is the correct answer
<u>A. They are likely not very accurate because they appear to be reported</u>.
Answer:
$38.26
Step-by-step explanation:
add the amounts together and multiply by 0.075 and 0.15 add these answers to the original amount
Four hundred thousand two hundred five
Answer:
The % Alicia speed walking is 125 % of average walking
Step-by-step explanation:
Given as :
Distance cover by Alicia while walking = 4 miles
Time taken = 1 hour
So, Speed of Alicia while walking = 
Or, S 1 = 
I.e S 1 = 4 mph
And
Distance cover by Alicia while speed walk = 5 miles
Time Taken = 1 hour
So, Speed of Alicia while speed walking =
Or, S 2 = 
I.e S 2 = 5 mph
Or, % Rate = 
×100 = 125
Hence The % Alicia speed walking is 125 % of average walking Answer
