The Supreme Court decision in Miranda v. Arizona, 384 US 436 (1966) required (for the first time) that someone accused of a crime be informed of his or her constitutional rights prior to interrogation. This protected the rights of the accused, or the defendant, in two new ways: 1) It educated the person about relevant constitutional rights; and 2) It inhibited law enforcement officials from infringing those rights by applying the Exclusionary Rule to any testimony/incriminating statements the defendant made unless he intentionally waived his rights.
Answer:
These are the answer choices for the question:
A. Divine Right of Kings
B. an oligarchy
C. consent of the citizens
D. the Congress
And this is the correct answer:
C. consent of the citizens
Explanation:
The phrase "We the People" establishes the US as a republic where the power of the government derives from the consent of the people. This is the idea of the social contract, which was developed by philosophers like John Locke and Voltaire, and that holds that people form governments in order to give some of their freedom in exchange for protection of their most basic rights: life, liberty and property.
Answer:
a
Explanation:
it's a. the study of mental processes and behavior.
That statement is true
Stafford act allows the government to ignore proper conduct rules if facing an emergency situation. In such situation, agencies are expected to provide necessary efforts as fast as possible. which is why they are allowed to skip over some authorities to coordinate their efforts.
Due to the environmental issues associated with palm oil plantations in Southeast Asia, governments are trying to limit the number allowed in the future. <span />
