The data are reported in the attached table.
We define the null hypothesis H₀ as the statement that is believed true until we prove it wrong with the test.
We define the alternative hypothesis H₁ as the statement we want to conclude with our test.
The difference in graffiti before (B) and after (A) will be:
d = A - B.
If the graffiti declined, it means that A will be smaller than B, therefore d should be negative.
Therefore we can set:
H₀ : μd ≥ 0
H₁ : μd < 0
The equal sign would mean that the number of graffiti incidents remained constant, therefore it is part of the null hypothesis.
Therefore the correct answer is B) H₀: μd ≥ 0 versus <span>H₁</span>: μd < 0
With wat?
Yes
Step by step explanation
Answer:
Event A = { Chevrolet , Buick }
Event B = { Ford , Lincoln }
Event C = { Toyota }
Step-by-step explanation:
- Mutually exclusive events are such that their probability of coming true simultaneously is zero. If we consider set notations we could say.
P (A & B) = P (B & C) = P (A & C) = 0
- In our case these events A,B, and C can be defined as:
Answer:
Event A = { Chevrolet , Buick }
Event B = { Ford , Lincoln }
Event C = { Toyota }
Answer:
x = 1
Step-by-step explanation:
Well the first step is to apply the distributive property:
4(3x - 1) is equal to (12x - 4). You DISTRIBUTE a '4' to what is inside the parentheses.
And btw, to make it easier, you can make 9 - x so that x is first. For example, (-x + 9). They're both the same thing, just written differently.
Your new equation is 12x - 4 = -x + 9. You want to now solve the equation.
Add the (-x) to both sides. It cancels out on the right side and you add it to 12x on the left side.
[If there's no number in front of a variable, you can always just put 1 in order to make it easier]
12x + 1x = 13x. Your new equation is 13x - 4 = 9. This should look very familiar. You simply add 4 to both sides. 9 + 4 = 13
Finally, 13x = 13. Divide 13 ÷ 13 to get 1.
x = 1