Answer:
The answer is C The difference between the value of the camera accepted and its value if it had been as warranted, medical costs for treating the grandfather's burns, and the cost to replace the grandfathers coat.
Explanation:
(C)When a buyer accepts goods that turn out to be defective, he may recover as damages any "loss resulting in the normal course of events from the breach," which includes the difference between the value of the goods accepted and the value they would have had if they had been as warranted, plus incidental and consequential damages. Incidental damages resulting from the seller's breach include expenses reasonably incurred in inspection, receipt, and transportation, care, and custody of goods rightfully rejected. In this case, the grandfather incurred no incidental damages. Consequential damages resulting from the seller's breach include any loss resulting from general or particular requirements and needs of which the seller at the time of contracting had reason to know and which could not reasonably be prevented by cover or otherwise, and injury to person or property proximately resulting from any breach of warranty. Here, the grandfather is entitled to breach of warranty damages for the loss of the camera—the difference between the value of the camera accepted and its value if it had been as warranted—plus damages for injury to his person (e.g., medical costs for treating the grandfather's burns) and property (i.e., the cost to replace his coat) because they were proximately caused from the breach of warranty. Thus, (C) is correct, and (A) and (B) are wrong. (D) is wrong because the cost of hiring the professional photographer was not foreseeable. The seller was not told of any particular requirements and needs of the grandfather at the time of contracting nor would the seller have reason to know that the grandfather planned to use the camera to take pictures of his grandson's graduation and would hire a professional photographer if he lost the use of the camera.
Answer:
Spanish remained hostile to the native groups as they considered to be uncivilized.
English avoided contact with the native groups, but that changed as the Native Indians helped them in settling in the New World.
French from the beginning remains friendly with the native as they relied on the fur trade.
Explanation:
French had a better relationship with the Native American compare to the other colonists in the New World. They kept a respectful relationship by signing treaties. French took furs pelts and in return gave manufactured goods like utensils, textiles, and weapons to the Native American.
Spanish had a very hostile relationship with the Native groups. Spaniards came to capture the land and make money for the emperor.
British at the beginning had a good bond with the Natives as they depend on there help for survival.
Answer:The most correct alternative of this question would be D: i., ii., and iii.
Explanation:
