Based on this scenario, it is likely that they weren’t able
to see each other a lot of each other outside of the school as it could be seen
in the scenario above where they likely to engage many conversations, showing a
fact that they weren’t able to see each other having them to have more things
to talk to.
According to Florida law, the thing that should be done with a badly discolored Uscg-approved pfd with a torn strap is to:
- <u>Discard and replace the PFD.</u>
<u />
A PFD is a personal flotation device that is worn by any person that is going on a boat ride in the ocean or for whatever reason is going to the river or ocean.
This helps the person wearing it to stay buoyant if he falls inside the water and protects him from drowning if he unexpectedly falls into the water.
USCG-approved PFD according to Florida law are supposed to be in good conditions at all times and if any one becomes badly discolored or damaged, then it should be discarded and replaced.
Therefore, the correct answer is <u>Discard and replace the PFD.</u>
Read more here:
brainly.com/question/10574949
Answer:
US fire administration
Explanation:
In 1974, Congress approved the Federal Fire Prevention and Control Act to bring an end to the losses incurred by the fire. U.S. Fire Administration (USFA) and the National Fire Academy (NFA) were created under this act. Many actions were taken to save lives and property from destruction. The act has helped in the reduction of deaths caused by fire and prevention of property.
Answer:
The desire for a new Constitution was borne out of some of the lapses of the Articles of Confederation which produced a weak central government. In 1787, representatives from 12 states from the existing 13 states in the United States converged to draft the new U.S Constitution. Several deliberations were made to form a better and stronger system of government. However, two alliances were formed at that time as a faction. One was the Federalists and the other was the Anti-Federalists. The Federalists were led by Alexander Hamilton, John Jay, and James Madison. They wanted a sizable amount of representation in government among states based on their population.
During the process of ratifying the Constitution, the Federalists argued that the Bill of Rights need not be part of the Constitution. They believed that with the addition of the Bill of Rights, the rights of citizens would be affected negatively and less protected.
The Anti-Federalists, on the other hand, wanted the same representation in all states. This alliance was led by Patrick Henry. They argued for the Bill of Rights and was against every move to establish a new Constitution, on the ground that, the constitution will give more powers to the National government and this will be detrimental to the citizens' rights.
A compromise was agreed on and after much debate on the issues of the Bill of Rights, the Constitution was submitted to the Congress of Federation in 1787 and by 1788, it had been ratified by most states.
