Answer:
This is known as the nature-nuture controversy.
Explanation:
I think that the best answer is "c. an incentive to bring their ideas to market" - you can see that through the statement of "<span>the opportunity to profit from their ideas"- an opportunity to profit is an incentive to work and in the case of the creators - to bring their ideas to market.
However, an opportunity to profit is not a guarantee that one will profit - so for example option a) is wrong. </span>
Answer:
The ethics are often environmentally linked. For being ethical there is no hard and fast law.
Explanation:
<u>Relativism Theory :
</u>
Stopping the moral values and trying to save everyone's life is not always fair. If the ailment is incurable, the physicians should pay attention to a physician and to god's forgiveness. Triple simple truth says the girl must be put on cardiovascular diagnosis to try and also save James living.
Ethical relativism is the theory that maintains that ethics is comparative to one's social values. How an act is right or wrong, such that, relies mostly on moral principles of a community where it is practiced. With one social structure, the very same activity may be morally right and in another, this may be ethically reprehensible.
Answer:
There is a strong correlation, and many do answer yes to this question, however, one must not mistake correlation for causation. While there is an increase in anxiety and depression in today's youths, we ought to try and look beyond just social media for a cause of this. In some cases, social media is the cause, but there is often an underlying cause besides just this, and often times there is an entirely different reason all together. Each case is different in and of itself.
