Answer:
199.02 units
Explanation:
The computation of the economic order quantity is shown below:
Data provided in the question
Annual demand per year = 5,750 units
The Cost of each units = $96
The inventory carrying cost per unit per year = $9
The average ordering cost per order = $31
So, economic order quantity is
= 199.02 units
Hence, the economic order quantity is 199.02 units
Answer:
will decrease by 40 units.
Explanation:
In supply function for good X the Price of W is Doubled. So any changein the price will increase the PW by double amount. The two times of price of good Y is subtracting from the supply function and price of the W will ultimately decrease the quantity demanded by double effect of each one dollar increase in it. So the supply of good X will decrease by 40 units.
Answer:
The errors are:
1. When the author is quoted in a sentence, his name is not in brackets, only the year of his book. For example, the write-up should have read like this: "Shindell (2008) argues that hackers increasingly integrate ..." This is a more appropriate way of citing an author. However, the writer could do well to show the exact words of Shindell with quotation marks to differentiate from his or her words.
2. Two sentences were put in quotation marks without any indication of the author(s) to which the words were attributed. Since they look like direct quotes from Shindell, the write-up should read like this: Shindell (2008) said, "during an attack, victims ..." And the second quoted sentence should read like this: "... were hit with ransomware in the previous 12 months," according to Shindell (2008).
Explanation:
Referencing somebody else's intellectual property helps to avoid plagiarism, which is considered as a very serious crime.
Answer:
The answer is: Ryan lost $1,200 dollars
Explanation:
Ryan sold short 300 shares of the stock when it was at $66. This means, he borrowed 300 shares from the broker with the obligation of buying them back later. When you sell short, you want the stock price to go down to make money, because when you buy them back you are buying at a lower price than what you sold them for, and the price difference times the number of shares is your gain.
In this case, the price went up to $70 and he decided to buy them back before the stock went higher up and he lost more money. Since he sold short at $66 and bought back at $70, it means he lost $70-$66=$4 per share. Multiply this by the amount of shares in the transaction $4x300=$1200. And that is the dollar return on his investment which is negative in this case.
