When performing work, there are specific requirements depending on which work Hayleah performs and these are <u>B) </u><u>Government </u><u>auditing </u><u>continuing education </u><u>requirement</u>
When dealing with governmental accounting:
- There are certain rules that must be followed.
- The specific rules imposed are to ensure better management of tax payer funds.
As a result, when a California CPA is involved in governmental work, specific rules known as the government auditing continuing education requirements will most likely apply.
In conclusion, option B is correct.
Find out more about different accounting standards at brainly.com/question/24441480.
Scenario 2 would be correct
Answer:
it's Jake, Kim, or Lyron or basically the first one but yours appears to be different
Option C
An increase in the real wage would result in a: movement along the labor demand curve, causing a decrease in the number of workers hired by the firm.
<u>Explanation:</u>
The wage rate is circumscribed by the crossing of supply and demand for labor. The demand curve depends on the marginal product of labor and the cost of the good labor originates.
A variation in the wage or payroll will end in a shift in the amount necessitated of labor. If the wage rate increases, organizations will require to hire fewer employees. The quantity of labor demanded will decline, and there will be a movement skyward on the demand curve.
Given:
<span>Fact 1: During contract negotiations, BB’s sales representative promised that the system was “A-1” and “perfect.”
</span><span>Fact 2: The written contract, which the parties later signed, disclaimed all warranties, express and implied.
</span><span>Fact 3: After installation the computer produced only random numbers and letters, rather than the desired accounting information
The express warranty is given in Fact 1 where the Sales Rep promised that the system was "A-1" and "perfect". There is a breach in express warranty here IF the written contract also expresses the same promises.
However, the written contract </span>disclaimed all warranties, express and implied. AND BOTH PARTIES SIGNED THIS CONTRACT. It implies that the buyer has read through the contract and has agreed with what is written in the contract. Thus, they can't file a suit against BB for breaching an express warranty since the written and signed contract has already disclaimed all warranties.
