ANSWER: 46.8
39% of 120
The word "of" means multiplied. So you will have to multiply 39% x 120
To do that, first step is to change the percent (39%) into a decimal
39% = 0.39 (You move the decimal twice to the left, not right)
There's an invisible decimal behind 9 so ALWAYS move it twice.
= 39(.)⇒ 0.39
Then your final step is to multiply
120 x 0.39
1 2 0
x 0 . 3 9 ← notice this decimal
_______ ∨
1 0 8 0 ∨
+ 3 6 0 0 ∨
_______ ∨
4 6 8 0 There's an invisible decimal before the 0. Move that decimal two times to the left. 4680(.)⇒ 46.8
Answer: 
Step-by-step explanation:
By the negative exponent rule, you have that:
By the exponents properties, you know that:
Therefore, you can rewrite the left side of the equation has following:
Descompose 32 and 8 into its prime factors:
Rewrite:
Then:
As the base are equal, then:
Solve for x:
Answer:
12
Step-by-step explanation:
60÷100=0.6 0.6x20=12
Therefore the sports shop has 12 part-time employees
Answer:
1: The correction option is B) Negative
Explanation
In economic theory, the Philips curve depicts the relationship between unemployment and inflation as a negative one. In order words, when inflation goes up, unemployment reduces.
The logic behind that thinking is, that inflation, which is the general increase in prices of goods/commodities and services is good for business. Business owners are quick to adjust to higher prices regardless of how it is induced and sometimes even profit from it in sectors not affected by inflation. So in such sectors, as business improves, it is assumed that there is a requirement to being in more hands to help with the expansion of the business.
2. The correct option is B) Holds for certain time periods
Explanation
Social scientists and researchers have plotted the data across various periods (20 years) using data from the US economy.
The following results emerged:
- the traditional relationship between inflation and unemployment held in 2001 during the mild recession triggered by the 9/11 situation. Unemployment took an upward spiral averaging an increase of 6% while inflation nosedived by 2.5%;
- Another snapshot was taken in the mid-2000s. This time unemployment went belly-up by several degrees, while inflation took off in the opposite direction by almost 5% before receding in 2006 when unemployment bottomed;
- In another analysis, the consumer price index took a steep downward dive during the Great Recession. This time, unemployment took a bullish charge, going up as much as 10%
- This negative relationship failed to hold between 2012 to 2015. Both factors developed a positive relationship and moved in the same direction;
- There has also been a loss of strength in the negative relationship as also seen in recent times. Specifically, between 2016 to 2019 where unemployment has steadily receded to 50-year lows, with inflation remained steady at an average of 2%.
So the correct answer is B.
3. The correct answer is True:
Explanation
As seen from the analysis above, the negative relationship remains largely true for most of the periods examined. Hence it is more pragmatic to expect a dip in unemployment whenever there is a spike in the CPI.
Cheers
Hi,
The answer you are looking for is 2. (-4,2)
Have a great day & remember to mark brainliest if I helped :)
