Answer:
change the world or rights something like that
Explanation:
-Two or more levels of government
-Courts have the power to interpret the Constitution
-Sources of revenue of each level is specified in the Constitution
-Different types of gov. govern the same citizens but each tier has its own jurisdiction
Constitutional adjudication is a system of checks and balances designed to determine the constitutionality and legitimacy of government conduct against the underlying constitutional norms and standards.
Answer:
No, as hearsay not within any exception.
Explanation:
(B) The sketch is inadmissible on hearsay grounds. Under Rule 801 of the Federal Rules, prior identification can be admissible, and the sketch could be deemed a prior identification. However, to be admissible, the witness must be there to testify at trial and be subject to cross-examination. The witness in this case is unavailable; hence, this exception does not apply. (D) is therefore incorrect. (A) applies to documentary evidence and has no relevance to this question. (C) is likewise not applicable, because this exception applies only to information within the personal knowledge of the public employee. In this case, the public employee gained the knowledge from the hearsay statements of an absent witness.
I believe it’s true unless something else is specifically given for using narcotics (alcohol is considered a drug because of its effects.)
