1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Mrac [35]
3 years ago
15

The exclusionary rule states that if evidence is found during an illegal search, itmust be destroyed immediately.cannot be admit

ted into consideration.can be admitted into court anyway.cannot be admitted into court unless a judge agrees.
Law
2 answers:
amid [387]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

B

Explanation:

LuckyWell [14K]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

Option 2 is the right answer

Explanation:

When government obtains any evidence though a conduct deemed unconstitutional (unlawful search or seizure), such evidence would be suppressed by the court. When the defendant is brought to court for eventual trial, such evidence would be inadmissible. U.S courts have used this rule in several occasions, to prevent police officers and agents of the government from abusing constitutional rights of the people.

You might be interested in
If a boy liked you and two other liked you what would you do.
anastassius [24]
Pick the one that’s nicer and if not the. Just pick the cuter one
3 0
3 years ago
Does sales tax depend on state?
Rainbow [258]

Answer:

yes

Explanation:

different states have different percent state tax

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is the correct answer
MrMuchimi
I believe its D. If i’m wrong, you can let me know and i’ll try again.
7 0
3 years ago
In the featured case Gonzales v. Raich, two California women challenged the federal government's ability to regulate their culti
Alekssandra [29.7K]

Answer:

the answer is C the Commerce Clause

Explanation: Monson and Raich sued, claiming that enforcing Federal law against them would violate the Commerce Clause, the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment, the Ninth Amendment, the Tenth Amendment, and the doctrine of medical necessity.

7 0
3 years ago
Patrick borrowed his friend John’s car to impress a young lady he was dating. It was a new luxury car that John had saved four y
larisa [96]

Answer:

Yes <em>and</em> no.

Patrick <em>would</em> be liable for negligence in <em>allowing</em> the hail damage, as he <em>failed</em> to fulfill his duty of taking reasonable care of the vehicle.

However, he would<em> not</em> be responsible for the hot oil and gravel nicks.

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Plz hurry idk how to do this :/
    10·1 answer
  • How have the courts shaped the issue of student speech over time? Consider changes in
    6·2 answers
  • 1. What are three reasons why voting is important to democracy?​
    11·1 answer
  • 1. Ken and Tran are good friends. They studied for an accountancy degree together at university. After graduation, they decide
    10·2 answers
  • I do not like our mayor at all. I think he has made some very bad choices and is not managing our town very well. I’m going to p
    6·2 answers
  • A 15-year-old sophomore high school student became pregnant, and the school board required her to attend a special program for p
    7·1 answer
  • President Obama was a member of the Democratic Party and is a-
    14·1 answer
  • if a person charged with treason denies his guilt, how many persons must testify against him before he can be convicted?
    6·1 answer
  • What were the two methods for proposing an amendment to the Constitution?
    11·2 answers
  • It would be inefficient to have a full election every time a decision is required by the government. So the US public elects off
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!