A. Television. I says i need more words so I am typing more. But the answer is A
Answer: The Early Middle Ages commenced with the deposition of the last western Roman emperor in 476, to be followed by the barbarian king, Odoacer, to the coronation of Charlemagne as "Emperor of the Romans" by Pope Leo III in Rome on Christmas Day, 800. The year 476, however, is a rather artificial division. In the East, Roman imperial rule continued through the period historians now call the Byzantine Empire. Even in the West, where imperial political control gradually declined, distinctly Roman culture continued long afterwards; thus historians today prefer to speak of a "transformation of the Roman world" rather than a "fall of the Roman Empire." The advent of the Early Middle Ages was a gradual and often localised process whereby, in the West, rural areas became power centres whilst urban areas declined. With the Muslim invasions of the seventh century, the Western (Latin) and Eastern (Greek) areas of Christianity began to take on distinctive shapes. Whereas in the East the Church maintained its strength, in the West the Bishops of Rome (i.e., the Popes) were forced to adapt more quickly and flexibly to drastically changing circumstances. In particular whereas the bishops of the East maintained clear allegiance to the Eastern Roman Emperor, the Bishop of Rome, while maintaining nominal allegiance to the Eastern Emperor, was forced to negotiate delicate balances with the "barbarian rulers" of the former Western provinces. Although the greater number of Christians remained in the East, the developments in the West would set the stage for major developments in the Christian world during the later centuries.
Early Medieval Papacy
Explanation:
It is hard to quantify, but I would say: yes, especially as far as human populations are concerned. Columbian exchange involved viruses and bacteria that caused sicknesses, and those were harder on the American population: many Americans died from European diseases.
Some Europeans died too, for example from syphilis, but not as many.
Answer: Deviance, distress, dysfunction and danger are all related because their result most times are negative
Explanation:
Deviance could be defined as the state of shifting or diverging from the normal standard as regards social or sexual related issues. Someone who is psychological abnormal would consider this normal in most cases and do them often.
Distress could be described as when an individual is subjected to extreme anxiety, sorrow or pain. A psychological abnormal fellow would want to remain in this mindset and refuse coming out form it and seem as though it's normal for him.
Dysfunction is described as the reverse of functional. When someone is against anything working.
Danger is a sign of warning of a bad event that's about to take place.
Danger would not be consider an abnormal when it's understood for a preventive measure, dysfunctional won't be considered abnormal when the event itself is immoral and the individual insist on doing right.
Dr. Huang is endorsing the dispositional perspective on personality. For example, if you think that a person is competitive, this is not just a description. You also believe that it is in his personality and there is a reason that influences why he acts all competitive. So this description would also reflect on his personality traits.
I hope I explained it well.Good day.