There are different kinds of theory. The principles that Adam Smith believe essential to the survival of an economy is the freedom to land and hold on to business profits.
<h3>What kinds of freedom did Adam Smith believe were vital to the survival of any economy? </h3>
Adam Smith was known to believe that the making of more resources available to all can make us to be more wealthier.
He believed freedom was important, such as the freedom to own land or property and hold on to the profits. He believed that people will participate in working very well, if they are given reward.
L earn more about Adam Smith from
brainly.com/question/50
Answer:
In which of the following situations would each of the members be responsible for producing an equal share of the total amount of output sold by the cartel engaged in joint profit maximization?
When marginal costs of production are the same for each of the members of the cartel.
Explanation:
D
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "A": Putting aside money for retirement.
Explanation:
Savings accounts are those where individuals' can deposit money to profit from the annual interest banks and financial institutions provide. Retirement accounts, on the other hand, are those funded with money discounted from employees' paychecks and do not allow withdrawals unless there is a major qualifying event -<em>if the type of retirement account allows it</em>.
Answer:
612,936 shares
Explanation:
The computation of the number of shares of stock must be sold is shown below:
Before that we have to compute
Required sales proceeds net of spread is
= (Raise amount + estimated cost for legal and accounting fees) ÷ (1 - spread rate)
= ($14.9 million + $582,000) ÷ (1 - 0.0815)
= ($1,5482,000) ÷ (1 - 0.0815)
= $16,855,743.06
So, shares to be sold is
= $16,855,743.06 ÷ $27.50
= 612,936 shares
Answer:
The answer is "Whenever a court requires him to use the res ipsa loquitur doctrine, he possibly would succeed".
Explanation:
Res ipsa loquitur is also an English common law doctrine which claims in an action for tort, throughout the absence of direct proof on whether any defendant acted, a jury may conclude neglect of the nature of an illness or incident. It is used in circumstances in which the complainant is not presented sufficient proof that the offender is not liable.
